If I verify a signature made with an untrusted key (e.g. own key with owner trust undefined) then gpg prints
gpg: Signature made Di 06 Jan 2026 16:35:20 CET
gpg: using EDDSA key 98FB8E8F8E5F58FA653E17A6FC9B2EF2C62AC7BE
gpg: Good signature from "t7790-expired" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
98FB8E8F8E5F58FA653E17A6FC9B2EF2C62AC7BEIf I repeat this after expiring the untrusted key then gpg prints
gpg: Signature made Di 06 Jan 2026 16:35:20 CET
gpg: using EDDSA key 98FB8E8F8E5F58FA653E17A6FC9B2EF2C62AC7BE
gpg: Good signature from "t7790-expired" [expired]
gpg: Note: This key has expired!
98FB8E8F8E5F58FA653E17A6FC9B2EF2C62AC7BEi.e. there's no "WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!"
If I revoke the key (don't mind that I actually used a different key from the one used above) then gpg prints
gpg: Signature made Mi 07 Jan 2026 10:48:38 CET
gpg: using EDDSA key 70709DA5588B9BC41D90845D73D10B0634EE46BA
gpg: Good signature from "t7790-revoked" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key has been revoked by its owner!
gpg: This could mean that the signature is forged.
gpg: reason for revocation: No reason specified
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
70709DA5588B9BC41D90845D73D10B0634EE46BAi.e. there's a warning about the revocation and a warning about the missing trusted key signature.
Given T7790: Kleopatra: "no trusted certification" should have precedence over "expired" in signature verification I assume that the warning about the missing trusted key signature should also be printed when verifying signatures made with expired keys.