Works, the expected behavior from the description is shown.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Oct 4 2023
I pushed rG321f9c0a3f28: tests:tpm2dtests: Fix tests with TPM2D. and rG98dd6f7af6aa: tests:tpm2dtests: Fix tests with SWTPM. (and other small changes).
Now, it works with two cases:
- tpm_server
- swtpm, swtpm_ioctl, and tssstartup
Oct 2 2023
Do you have any hint how I can test this? I installed Chinese-Simplified (zh_CN) but I fear switching the display Language. Maybe I should just use _wasctime and convert to utf8
Sep 30 2023
I guess we should add an extended API to set the filter.
Sep 29 2023
Under Kleopatra -> Settings -> Configure Kleopatra -> GnuPG System -> In the Tab Secret Keys -> Is there either "Delete unused Passwords after N Seconds or Delete Passwords after N Seconds set to zero or the option "Do not use the password cache for signing" set? In this case this would be normal and expected behavior because it turns of the caching.
Thanks for the report and the helpful suggestion. I was anyway about to change the time format but your suggestion is better.
I am not sure whether we need to fix things in kleo but at some places gpg uses atoi() to parse the seconds since epoch. This should be fixed because that is the way gpgme provides the expiry time. I will also look into the ISO date string parser.
Sep 28 2023
Maybe it's due to the fact that I used a non-admin installation? Actually I'm also surprised that it worked that way. What kind of debug logs could I supply?
works as described
For me with Gpg4win 4.2.0 it works as expected, that is all UIDs which have a checkmark are certified in one go, entry of password only once. Used the key given in description for the test.
After the fix everything after the Signature block is now silently discarded
Changing debug options unfortunately didn't change much.
Sep 27 2023
Sep 26 2023
Lot's of things changed in the meantime.
Lot's of changes since 2.4.
Eva and me tested this using our 2.2.42 release candidate on Linux and
on Windows and were not able to replicate your problem.
Eva can you please try to reproduce this? I can't really imagine that this is true since we have soooo many users with yubikeys and do a lot of internal testing on them. To be fair please try with your standard devuan GnuPG and not just with an up to date version.
Sep 25 2023
Instead of all the debug options, please use
Sep 22 2023
I think there is a timing issue between the termination of a job and the retrieval of gpg's output, so that gpg's output is sometimes truncated or even completely empty. This is a general problem and not specific for this ticket.
works with VS-Desktop-3.2.0.0-beta214, too.
You are now informed that you do not have permissions to write there.
Kleopatra now shows:
Sep 21 2023
works in 22, too (tested with VS-Desktop-3.2.0.0-beta214)
Re-open to add auto-detection.
Relevant lines from Arch's qconfig.pri:
QT.global.enabled_features = shared pkg-config rpath reduce_relocations signaling_nan zstd thread future concurrent dbus openssl-linked opensslv30 shared shared rpath reduce_exports no_direct_extern_access reduce_relocations openssl QT.global.disabled_features = static cross_compile debug_and_release separate_debug_info appstore-compliant simulator_and_device force_asserts framework c++20 c++2a c++2b c++2b wasm-simd128 wasm-exceptions opensslv11 QT.global.disabled_features += release build_all QT_CONFIG += shared rpath reduce_exports no_direct_extern_access reduce_relocations openssl release CONFIG += shared plugin_manifest
Per IRC discussion, this could be autodetected in qt6.m4 by querying Qt6Platform.pc for mkspecsdir and grepping ${mkspecsdir}/qconfig.pri for QT_CONFIG.*no_direct_extern_access.
No need for QA on build issues.
The Qt 6 bindings will now be compiled with the -mno-direct-extern-access flag if --enable-no-direct-extern-access is passed to configure.
Fixed by ingo
Sep 20 2023
In T6696#175866, @antonio-rojas wrote:This is a Qt issue. Reported at https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-117398
This is a Qt issue. Reported at https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-117398
There has been another report on the Gpg4win Forum which might be related that mails now cause endless syncs and might even break further when they are saved back to the same exchange server as there is no MAPI to MIME conversion done anymore and other clients cannot read the mime structure.
This is a serious regression.
Sep 19 2023
that's really cool :) .. I tested now with a mail whole having the Warning message, I press "Show Mail" and it indeed open .. see the pic.
very nice feature indeed.
Meanwhile, can you please share how to use the new feature "open the mail from the Kleopatra menu" would be nice to test it.
Thanks a lot Andre ... I believe it's solved.
Sep 18 2023
Maybe its not a com addin but one of the New JavaScript webapi addins? They have a different menu to disable. Definetly not an outlook feature its this protectit thingy. But have you now Trierdto open the mail from the Kleopatra menu? That is the cool New feature we are currently working on.
I disable all Addons (see screenshots) and restarted the Outlook, but still getting the same warning when trying to open the email.
Ah wait, in the first of your screenshots it is obvious which addin is modifying your mail so that we don't see it as an encrypted mail anymore. It is that warning text from the protection Addin that you should report that mail if you are unsure where it came from. That would cause such problems because when it inserts this text the type of the mail is changed and it is no longer detected as an encrypted mail.
There in the last screenshot on the right. Btw. since the mail you sent me with the ZIP archive looked also fine to me, there might be another problem here. Could you try disabling your other Addons in Outlook temporarily and check if that might solve the issue? Other addons are also often a cause for some unusual client behavior. You can do that if you go to File -> Options -> Add-Ins -> Manage COM Addins, and then unselect others just for a test.
this is what I'm getting when trying to open the mail then the attachment. Am i missing something?
strange, your test mail in the attachment decrypted for me, too. What happens if you now use the "Show EMail" button?
With Gpg4win-4.2.1-beta31 I can no longer import the secret part of the edward.tester@demo.gnupg.com.p12 Testkey. Error is "Invalid object".
I've installed the Beta version, but issue still exist !!
My encrypted mails are readable by the other party, while I can't read his mail giving the same error msg "Decryption succeeded ......... Note: you cannot be sure who encrypted this message as it is not signed" , while I can read my sent encrypted mails.
see attached.
Any suggestions?
Thanks .. will try it now
Please try: https://files.gpg4win.org/Beta/gpg4win-4.2.1-beta55/gpg4win-4.2.1-beta55.exe This should solve your problem. And if not you can now open the encrypted attachments with Kleopatra and it will show your mail.
Working on both. Beta will come later today, I had one on friday but did not upload it yet and need to recompile it first.
Sep 17 2023
Hi Andre,
Sep 14 2023
Thanks Andre for your response..
I am pretty sure that we can fix that issue and have a beta for you maybe even today or tomorrow. But afterwards we should talk about your company actually using a product with professional support (which you are getting right now from me) like GnuPG Desktop. Gpg4win is basically only "goodwill" support.
Sep 13 2023
I tested once more with another person, issue confirmed, he can read my encrypted mail (as you did), however, I can NOT read his emails (with the same error: you cannot be sure who encrypted this message as it is not signed)
Sep 12 2023
Yes, I can decrypt my sent mails, in my Sent folder
To say this differently, the problem fixed recently which Relaxed detection of encrypted mails might still fix your problem. But the "corruption" of the mail which makes it harder to detect as a crypto mail for GpgOL does not happen when you send a mail, it appears to happen when you receive a mail.
Received, but it is not the same problem at least on your side. Your mail looks perfect. It would have been handled by any version of GpgOL on my side. So I think it is the receiving side meaning your incoming crypto mails are modfied by some middleware in a way that GpgOL does not detect them as crypto mails anymore. But before we debug more here with logs for you, let me finish up some other work on GpgOL and I can probably give you and some others in the tracker here a beta this week where we can then confirm if its already fixed. I'm currently actively working on GpgOL.
I sent the test encrypted email
Thanks once more... and appreciate your swift response.
Yes the resolution in that issue is "I have fixed this, you need to wait for the next update." The comments above explain the problem, the mail is modified in transit, if you change something there then you can maybe workaround in the meantime. The exact comment I linked gave the instructions on how to assist with analyizing this issue. If you would follow them I could also tell you for sure weather or not this is your problem. https://dev.gnupg.org/T6686#174856
Thank you for your reply.
Ok. Let me unpack this for you. I think your problem is that now since you switched to your new domain the mails in Outlook are no longer directly decrypted, then you open the attachment and get this message.
I am closing this, for now as this issue lacks actionable details, we would need an example mail or debug data. So my intent is just to close it and reopen if the issue still occurs with Gpg4win-4.2.1
Noticed this issue while searching for a different one.
I think this could be fixed with T6686 if it has not already been fixed by a previous change that relaxed the detection of the encrypted message part better.
Sep 11 2023
Hi, it would be great to make Kleopatra remember the last used settings.
Thank you for your time and your answer, we really do appreciate your work. We invested in this in hope to help make the software better. Please try it, so you will see how it works. We were able to reproduce the problem the way I described. When installed as a normal user it won't work. Installed as an Administrator user it works. So the more secure way does not work currently.
The way how you install it can have nothing to do with that, it must be a different issue, but it sounds to me like you are messing with privileges a bit too much. Did you ever receive the warning of Kleopatra that you are running it as Administrator and that will mess up the rights in your GnuPG folder? Be honest. :)
You mean if you right click on a file and select sign & encrypt or if you choose the action from Kleopatra?
For another user this change caused endless syncs. Since I do not yet see a way to fix this without risking again that the plaintext leaks to the server under some circumstances, because the problem is that I still do not know how to reproduce these circumstances, my plan is to at least add an option in the debug tab of Kleopatra to disable this "save back" feature.
Sep 10 2023
Sep 7 2023
this works now:
@ebo: I just a did a test build: gnupg-vs-desktop-3.2.0-beta178-x86_64.AppImage in my directory