Building without "--disable-asm" works without any issues.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Jan 29 2021
Thanks for your report.
FYI, this is not just an MacOS issue. We see that also on Gentoo Linux:
@hanno, this is a bug tracker and not yet another media for your rants.
Yeah looks like a duplicate. You may rename the bug to "Please implement some basic safety checks in a CI".
This should already be fixed in libgcrypt 1.9.1 by rCc6425a5537294dfe2beaafc9105f7af4ceac677f.
Jan 28 2021
Patch lets it build on xenial for me, thank you.
Patch for this bug is available here, "attachment-0001.bin": https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gcrypt-devel/2021-January/005079.html
I committed the partial result docker container, so I can restart it for investigation. So:
I tested xenial with gcc-5.3 (xenial distro repo) and gcc-5.4 (xenial-updates distro repo) and libgcrypt 1.9.0 from git repo and from tarball. I did not get any errors.
Jan 27 2021
https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/System/Conceptual/ManPages_iPhoneOS/man2/posix_spawn.2.html dated August 9, 2007.
So, I guess that posix_spawn became available in MacOS X Leopard (10.5).
Also support older MacOS X, which has no posix_spawn.
Thanks @aheinecke for fixing my fix with 2859edd! Closing here.
Jan 26 2021
In T5264#142204, @jukivili wrote:I also needed this patch:
0001-global-fix-compile-error-at-pragma-GCC-diagnostic.patch2 KBDownloadI am going to check whether I need it on Tiger!
In T5264#142204, @jukivili wrote:I tested building on Ubuntu 8.04 (gcc-4.2) and got same error about cipher_bulk_ops_t. Applying patch fixed that problem.
I see now my mistake: I also have to re-write line #132 which I did not see yet!
With your other patch I still get:
libtool: compile: /opt/local/bin/gcc-apple-4.2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -I../src -I../mpi -I../mpi -I/opt/local/include -I/opt/local/include -pipe -Os -std=gnu89 -arch ppc -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wall -MT cipher.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/cipher.Tpo -c cipher.c -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/cipher.o In file included from cipher.c:31: ./cipher-internal.h:145: error: redefinition of typedef 'cipher_bulk_ops_t' ../src/cipher-proto.h:132: error: previous declaration of 'cipher_bulk_ops_t' was here
In T5264#142203, @jukivili wrote:Thanks for testing. However, I do not believe patch has been correctly applied.
The "Portfile" that conducts the build process has the patch contained, I sent you the list of files being patched, and here is the end of my translated patch set:
I tested building on Ubuntu 8.04 (gcc-4.2) and got same error about cipher_bulk_ops_t. Applying patch fixed that problem.
Thanks for testing. However, I do not believe patch has been correctly applied.
In T5264#142094, @jukivili wrote:Here's patch to try out:
0001-cipher-proto-remove-forward-typedef-of-cipher_bulk_o.patch6 KBDownload
T4702 is our release info task for 2.3.0
You should have received mail with additional log levels now
In T5264#142064, @jukivili wrote:In "src/cipher-proto.h", try removing typedef and leaving just forward declaration of structure.
Performing only this change leads consistently to the well-known error of:
In T5264#142059, @werner wrote:Do not use -fno-common
The translated bulk patch fails. Compilation still runs into this error:
In T5264#142094, @jukivili wrote:Here's patch to try out:
0001-cipher-proto-remove-forward-typedef-of-cipher_bulk_o.patch6 KBDownload
@gniibe Hi! Can you estimate, when this feature will be released?
I have not found this patch in the latest GnuPG release tags (in the Git repository) either by the name or the commit hash.
Thanks for the report. Some time ago I wrote the code in a way that when setting the HTML body failed it would fallback to the plain body, regardless of the preferences:
So even though there is an error that error is handled. https://dev.gnupg.org/source/gpgol/browse/master/src/mail.cpp;4d57033a095aecf8529606428efef6af466f1196$1488
Alright!
@ballapete when you have time, could you also test https://dev.gnupg.org/T5268#142155 on Tiger?
Jan 25 2021
Right now I am compiling with my old PowerBook in Tiger. In case a compilation fails I'll try this patch – on Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4.11)! It's a bit more primitive than Leopard.
Here's patch to try out:
BTW, we should better get back to the classic/GNU-coding-style pattern:
In "src/cipher-proto.h", try removing typedef and leaving just forward declaration of structure.
Do not use -fno-common
Jan 24 2021
Does attached patch help?
There’s a patch to restore support for Qt4: D521.
Jan 23 2021
My bad, prior to the release I tested only against Qt5.
I tried it - that doesn't help. Same error message.
Thanks for the report. As you noticed, issue had been reported already.
That might be helpful. But, on the other hand, if I had just googled the problem I was seeing I would have gotten answer quite fast.
Problem is in GET_DATA_POINTER macro. MacOS assembler expects data references in some different format than Linux. Could you try following edit and see if libgcrypt then compiles? In cipher/asm-common-aarch64.h, there is definition of GET_DATA_POINTER macro:
#ifdef _WIN32 #define GET_DATA_POINTER(reg, name) \ adrp reg, name ; \ add reg, reg, #:lo12:name ; #else #define GET_DATA_POINTER(reg, name) \ adrp reg, :got:name ; \ ldr reg, [reg, #:got_lo12:name] ; #endif