On this page: https://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.html the
instructions for verifying the GnuPG download are missing the necessary
gpg --recv-keys KEYID
step without which you get a "public key not found" error.
On this page: https://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.html the
instructions for verifying the GnuPG download are missing the necessary
gpg --recv-keys KEYID
step without which you get a "public key not found" error.
The issue is not resolved: if "gpg --recv-keys" is not sufficient, then some
other step must be added to the instructions, as currently they do not work, at
least not for this non-expert user.
There are two problems:
the signature is good and made by of the signing keys." (Maybe the solution is
as simple as deleting "of"?)
key, either by checking the fingerprint of that key with other sources or by
checking that the key has been signed by a trustworthy other key." Someone who
is trying to download GnuPG as part of bootstrapping a secure environment for
the first time (e.g. so they can download other software such as Tor in a
trustworthy way), will not know how to follow either of those suggestions.
Concrete instructions are needed.
If I simply download the GPG sources and corresponding signature, and run the
gpg --verify command that is given, I get the following output:
gpg: directory `/home/rrt/.gnupg' created
gpg: new configuration file `/home/rrt/.gnupg/gpg.conf' created
gpg: WARNING: options in `/home/rrt/.gnupg/gpg.conf' are not yet active during
this run
gpg: keyring `/home/rrt/.gnupg/pubring.gpg' created
gpg: Signature made Wed 01 Jul 2015 13:56:58 BST using RSA key ID 4F25E3B6
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
gpg: Signature made Thu 02 Jul 2015 05:31:06 BST using RSA key ID 33BD3F06
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
In other words, it doesn't seem to do anything useful.
I've tried to improve the web page.
Since Werner needs to check this, I'm changing the status of this issue to
testing and adding him to the cc.
@Reuben: If you have some ideas of additional improvements, I'd be grateful.
Thanks.