User Details
- User Since
- Mar 27 2017, 4:48 PM (364 w, 15 h)
- Roles
- Administrator
- Availability
- Busy Busy until Feb 11 2030.
Yesterday
So, what is the state of this. Did a change already land in Kleopatra and how can we assure that all binaries have a W32INFO_PRODUCTNAME in their rc file?
See T7046 for the release info. Note that the mentioned fix for kwallet already landed.
Noteworthy changes in version 1.2.1 (2022-08-24)
AFAICS the bounce is correctly reported. You get the 550 at the mail from so that there won't be a need for several SPF checks if a sender wants to send to several recipients.
Fri, Mar 15
Thu, Mar 14
Thanks for reporting this. Returning error codes to upper layers is not always easy because the original logic is that we have a global error counter to decide whether an operation succeeded. My fix to check the error code before emitting the DECRYPTION_OKAY status,
Wed, Mar 13
But only if you can figure out in a transaction or locked sytate whether the card needs a verify. Otherwise we have a race between changing the PIN and verifying a PIN.
Tue, Mar 12
Mon, Mar 11
It could have been discussed whether this makes sense. However, we can't change it anymore because it would change the behaviour. Consider a cron job which looks into a directory with keyids and imports them from a keyserver. It is totally fine if the script returns success if no keys are available.
Your above excerpt for the log is not a bounce. Can you please give me an example from a rejected bounce? Noet that BATV is also in use.
Sun, Mar 10
That is on purpose. Please add an SPF record to your site. If there is really really a problem for you with that, write me off tracker.
See T7034
Sorry, this is not a help line but a bug tracker. If you lost or forgot your password you are screwed up.
Fri, Mar 8
Thu, Mar 7
Wed, Mar 6
See also rG40b85d8e8cecadf35e51e84b30de4fac820d714b for gnupg 2.4.
Sorry, for not following up earlier. Can you please do me a favor and run the last tests again, this time adding -v and --debug 1 to the invocation? Feel free to forward the output to my private address is that is easier (wk at gnupg.org).