User Details
- User Since
- Mar 27 2017, 4:49 PM (400 w, 1 d)
- Availability
- Available
May 13 2010
That's a fair point. However it's just not there in glibc (at least I couldn't
find it). But if that's the only offending part the first two hunks could just
be skipped.
May 12 2010
Hi Werner,
the G_* stuff is from GLIB/GTK+ so for a GTK+ object it's what somebody would
expect. If you want to stay close to the rest of the pinentry coding style I'm
or course fine with that.
May 9 2010
Here's the link to the GTK+ 3 transition:
May 8 2010
Compat with older GTK+
This still affects 0.8.0.
Aug 13 2009
Hi Marcus,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 01:29:26PM -0000, Marcus Brinkmann via BTS wrote:
Marcus Brinkmann <marcus@g10code.com> added the comment:
I don't see a reason to apply the patch, there are no po files generated for
pinentry. Is this to sync our copy of gtksecentry of another project? I
checked krb5-auth-dialog in Ubuntu, and it does not have this patch.
The patch is in krb5-auth-dialog's upstream. Ubuntu is lagging as
usual, Debian has it.
Jul 2 2009
Any chance this gets applied?
Apr 24 2009
Apr 3 2009
The coupling to secmem is why I propsed this for pinentry not for GTK+ itself.