Friendly ping @werner

Thanks!

Same issue exists in 2.2:

Hi @420Dreamin - you just "fixed" the typo I was trying to demonstrate :/

Any updates / thoughts on how this might be fixed?

It's been a year since last update. Still an issue. Maybe someone should send
an email to gnupg-commits-owner@gnupg.org ?

I took a look at the source code and now understand what is going on here.
The code indicates: One or more secret keys (primary or sub) were found.
But the UI message suggests that the secret key of the current (primary) key was
found, hence my confusion.

Here are some ideas:

1. EASY: Update the message to indicate it is generic and not specific to the key

being edited.

OR

2. HARDER: Improve the logic so the message is specific to the key being edited.

Thoughts?

Here you go:

My master key is offline and I have subkeys on a Yubikey. As expected, I see sec# when listing keys when using the
online system:

gpg -K
sec# 4096R/2FFA7695 2016-02-01 [expires: 2020-01-31]
uid NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS.COM>
ssb> 2048R/EA7CCF1B 2016-02-01
ssb> 2048R/1E8DA9B9 2016-02-01
ssb> 2048R/5BA60C24 2016-02-01
However, when I go into edit mode, gpg indicates that the "Secret is available":

gpg --edit-key 2FFA7695
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.19; Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Secret key is available.

pub 4096R/2FFA7695 created: 2016-02-01 expires: 2020-01-31 usage: C

trust: ultimate      validity: ultimate

sub 2048R/EA7CCF1B created: 2016-02-01 expires: 2018-01-31 usage: S
sub 2048R/1E8DA9B9 created: 2016-02-01 expires: 2018-01-31 usage: E
sub 2048R/5BA60C24 created: 2016-02-01 expires: 2018-01-31 usage: A
[ultimate] (1). NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS.COM>
[ultimate] (2) [jpeg image of size 1234]

Tested with several recent versions of GnuPG. Am I misunderstanding this message?

Bug system broke the link URL. Here is a shorter one:
http://security.stackexchange.com/q/115230/16036