Change Details

It seems that Japanese Translation activities are not that active. So, I put the `po` for Japanese here. KDE JP suggests peculiar use of `po` for plurals for Japanese (keeping `nplurals=2` even if Japanese has no prurals: https://jp.kde.org/community/getinvolved/translation/ It's against the standard practice of gettext, and it has no sense for Kleo at all, so, I don't follow that. I assume that it's OK for the upstream to push the translation.

It seems that Japanese Translation activities are not that active. So, I put the `po` for Japanese here. KDE JP suggests peculiar use of `po` for plurals for Japanese (keeping `nplurals=2` even though Japanese has no plurals): https://jp.kde.org/community/getinvolved/translation/ It's against the standard practice of gettext, and it has no sense for Kleo at all, so, I don't follow that (follow the standard practice, instead). I assume that it's OK for the upstream to push the translation.

It seems that Japanese Translation activities are not that active. So, I put the `po` for Japanese here. KDE JP suggests peculiar use of `po` for plurals for Japanese (keeping `nplurals=2` even ifthough Japanese has no prlurals:): https://jp.kde.org/community/getinvolved/translation/ It's against the standard practice of gettext, and it has no sense for Kleo at all, so, I don't follow that (follow the standard practice, instead). I assume that it's OK for the upstream to push the translation.