Change Details

This is the validation result if you sign a file and after that change its content: {F5387673} I think the wording could be improved. We should at least add some more information, as IMHO for a user the combination of "The signature is VS-NfD compliant" and "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature" is contradictory. As well as linguistically ugly with the doubling of "invalid". How about something like "The signature is invalid for file <abc.txt>" instead of "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature"? And possibly to be more verbose: "The file has been changed after the signature or the wrong file was given for verification." And if there are other possible reasons for an invalid signature, I would like to have them listed here in some form, too.

This is the validation result if you sign a file and after that change its content: {F5387673} I think the wording could be improved. We should at least add some more information, as IMHO for a user the combination of "The signature is VS-NfD compliant" and "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature" is contradictory. As well as linguistically ugly with the doubling of "invalid". Edit (2024-06-18): We decided to overhaul the message completely, not only for invalid signatures, but for the valid ones, too and combined decrypt/verify. The details have still to be decided.

This is the validation result if you sign a file and after that change its content: {F5387673} I think the wording could be improved. We should at least add some more information, as IMHO for a user the combination of "The signature is VS-NfD compliant" and "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature" is contradictory. As well as linguistically ugly with the doubling of "invalid". How about something like "The signature is invalid for file <abc.txt>" instead of "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature"? And possibly to be more verbose: "The file has been changed after the signature or the wrong file was given for verification."Edit (2024-06-18): And if there are other possible reasons for anWe decided to overhaul the message completely, not only for invalid signatures, I would like to have them listed here in some formbut for the valid ones, too.too and combined decrypt/verify. The details have still to be decided.