This is the validation result if you sign a file and after that change its content:
I think the wording could be improved. We should at least add some more information, as IMHO for a user the combination of "The signature is VS-NfD compliant" and "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature" is contradictory. As well as linguistically ugly with the doubling of "invalid".
Edit (2024-06-18):
We decided to overhaul the message completely, not only for invalid signatures, but for the valid ones, too and combined decrypt/verify.
Edit (2024-09-16):
Todo:
- remove the summary for all signatures as a whole
- font color should always be black
- remove the import / search buttons, instead make the fingerprints link to either search window or the certificate details
- we need a substructure for the signatures in order to
- color the background of every verification result separately: green, red, white (maybe only a colored bar in front of the result instead or additionally)
- put an icon in front of the verification result
- show no text "not VS-NfD compliant" for invalid signatures
- keep the text for the results easy to comprehend even if read by screen reader (important info first etc)
- possibly sort the signatures in some way
Note (not only) for testing: Check out
- single signatures valid/invalid
- multiple signatures with combinations of valid/invalid