Change Details

This is the validation result if you sign a file and after that change its content: {F5387673} I think the wording could be improved. We should at least add some more information, as IMHO for a user the combination of "The signature is VS-NfD compliant" and "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature" is contradictory. As well as linguistically ugly with the doubling of "invalid". Edit (2024-06-18): We decided to overhaul the message completely, not only for invalid signatures, but for the valid ones, too and combined decrypt/verify. The details have still to be decided.

This is the validation result if you sign a file and after that change its content: {F5387673} I think the wording could be improved. We should at least add some more information, as IMHO for a user the combination of "The signature is VS-NfD compliant" and "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature" is contradictory. As well as linguistically ugly with the doubling of "invalid". Edit (2024-06-18): We decided to overhaul the message completely, not only for invalid signatures, but for the valid ones, too and combined decrypt/verify. Edit (2024-09-16): Todo: * remove the summary for all signatures as a whole * font color should always be black * remove the import / search buttons, instead make the fingerprints link to either search window or the certificate details * we need a substructure for the signatures in order to * color the background of every verification result separately: green, red, white (maybe only a colored bar in front of the result instead or additionally) * put an icon in front of the verification result * show no text "not VS-NfD compliant" for invalid signatures * keep the text for the results easy to comprehend even if read by screen reader (important info first etc) * possibly sort the signatures in some way Note (not only) for testing: Check out * single signatures valid/invalid * multiple signatures with combinations of valid/invalid

This is the validation result if you sign a file and after that change its content: {F5387673} I think the wording could be improved. We should at least add some more information, as IMHO for a user the combination of "The signature is VS-NfD compliant" and "The signature is invalid: Invalid Signature" is contradictory. As well as linguistically ugly with the doubling of "invalid". Edit (2024-06-18): We decided to overhaul the message completely, not only for invalid signatures, but for the valid ones, too and combined decrypt/verify. Edit (2024-09-16): Todo: * remove the summary for all signatures as a whole * font color should always be black * remove the import / search buttons, instead make the fingerprints link to either search window or the certificate details * we need a substructure for the signatures in order to * color the background of every verification result separately: green, red, white (maybe only a colored bar in front of the result instead or additionally) * put an icon in front of the verification result * show no text "not VS-NfD compliant" for invalid signatures * keep the text for the results easy to comprehend even if read by screen reader (important info first etc) * possibly sort the signatures in some way Note (not only) for testing: Check out The details have still to be decided. * single signatures valid/invalid * multiple signatures with combinations of valid/invalid