Over on https://bugs.debian.org/900247, Bjarni Ingi Gislason reports:
Warning from "groff":
<gpg-check-pattern.1>:19 (macro BR): only 1 argument, but more are expected
Output is from: test-groff -b -e -mandoc -T utf8 -rF0 -t -w w -z
[ "test-groff" is a developmental version of "groff" ]
Summary of changes:
Use correct font for "options" (denotes variable text)
Split long lines (> 80) (and make only the first word bold)
Change a two-fonts macro to an one-font macro for a singular argument
Details:
Test nr. 16:
Use the correct macro for the font change of one argument.
Split a punctuation mark from the only argument if one is there
19:.BR \-\-check
Test nr. 42:
Split lines longer than 80 characters into two or more lines.
Appropriate break points are the end of a sentence and a subordinate
clause.
gpg-check-pattern.1: line 12 length 90
.B gpg\-check\-pattern checks a passphrase given on stdin against a specified patternfile.
Patch:
--- gpg-check-pattern.1 2018-02-22 22:20:18.000000000 +0000 +++ gpg-check-pattern.1.new 2018-05-28 00:57:21.000000000 +0000 @@ -5,18 +5,19 @@ gpg-check-pattern \- Check a passphrase .SH SYNOPSIS .B gpg\-check\-pattern -.RB [ options ] +.RI [ options ] .I patternfile .SH DESCRIPTION -.B gpg\-check\-pattern checks a passphrase given on stdin against a specified patternfile. +.B gpg\-check\-pattern +checks a passphrase given on stdin against a specified patternfile. .SH OPTIONS .TP .BR \-v ", " \-\-verbose Produce verbose output .TP -.BR \-\-check +.B \-\-check run only a syntax check on the patternfile .TP .BR \-0 ", " \-\-null