If I put the following into notepad
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 bar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE0MFuEqOl54V/b8HTD1vkKiPJHOMFAmTBMWMACgkQD1vkKiPJ HONzdQf/aty0AjMuKRbI7s9oN2fTMzKglnopBBsJH/ozravsHt3NzW6qeI+JN8Ga yMgwu7991di2q3+dHzLylL/uLxomh3TQnQTsak3kfzVJt8fKgY3lpFZamgpGQlme r0xioe5ylaIipItt06XIeZMnwrS+dfDhAW1G6x98nSOCN+SlqmrPpVrf2+J3hLXq 4oRZExYD3WIQAOl5a6LBJ7nKxal7Y+ZzLNKo1Fdv0BSeaClVXTeUFCivZiw0zcEI eguDK8fk7kx3MDuwQxV3+juWaMDCNNVV4QBIMZjXusv2i7vHkfTWrPy+m+CmkIJz MEHj/W7d30v2HqNYtrwOSmMhv1+wOg== =vlPl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mDMEYg5XKRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAoiviwSeMJbcbE8t9mHgrSqgT5F4LQyLzUckU E6Sx5aiIgwQgFgoAKxYhBIHOfS+ZLzoe/uBZMa7qmxcSWxd7BQJiQaR2DR0BbGlu ZTEKbGluZTIACgkQruqbFxJbF3uT1wD/UzkNkMwK/kDHxT4xxwY6OeRZdeZauGtv vKnvcyM16V0A/0IEIlQmSKyp/OEFZy45VBunJZJkReRMS9pA0Y+ouBgKtB9KYW5l IERvZSA8amFuZS5kb2VAZXhhbXBsZS5uZXQ+iJoEExYKAEICGwMFCQAosgcFCwkI BwIDIgIBBhUKCQgLAgQWAgMBAh4HAheAFiEEgc59L5kvOh7+4FkxruqbFxJbF3sF AmLyVRUACgkQruqbFxJbF3s/cgEAqwbErDdIhKudkFrk8wY6VkNBDf4jf2SGyDz1 BL9pJt0A/0IkhlpHU6rtqylJuuCFpLmKbFlXdXdrCoEwisFrY8QJtAZibGFibGGI nAQTFgoARAIbAwUJACiyBwULCQgHAgIiAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeBwIXgBYhBIHO fS+ZLzoe/uBZMa7qmxcSWxd7BQJi8lUWAhkBAAoJEK7qmxcSWxd7H+UBAP/y1phn ojnKvF72jm7uaLN+mTVKjt71nxPi8TvBASC1AP0bt5vAiAqlCOYACvm2mg8pw18f 1YXXOBkcbTLUimkyD7g4BGIOVykSCisGAQQBl1UBBQEBB0DkecMMBdYTabaTqAbV GlWplsf68h+uv8N78t0bEjVmGAMBCAeIfgQYFgoAJhYhBIHOfS+ZLzoe/uBZMa7q mxcSWxd7BQJiDlcpAhsMBQkAKLIHAAoJEK7qmxcSWxd7GgsBAMvJUPcHIs4dHlqS o2P7NfJvkFpqFUeGaP8upALUiijRAQDz13cloc0StTGn5uWPZCGQkzn8MzX+yiPZ mxnjHfafCg== =+jHe -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
I get the result
Notepad → Notepad: Valid signature by keytocard@example.net Signature created on Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2023 16:44:51 CEST With certificate: Test key for Key to Card <keytocard@example.net> (089F 4ED8 0F38 4779) The signature is valid and the certificate's validity is ultimately trusted.
and in the text field
bar pub ed25519 2022-02-17 [SC] [revoked: 2022-03-28] 81CE7D2F992F3A1EFEE05931AEEA9B17125B177B rev AEEA9B17125B177B 2022-03-28 [selfsig] uid Jane Doe <jane.doe@example.net> sig AEEA9B17125B177B 2022-08-09 [selfsig] uid blabla sig AEEA9B17125B177B 2022-08-09 [selfsig] sub cv25519 2022-02-17 [E] [revoked: 2022-03-28] sig AEEA9B17125B177B 2022-02-17 [keybind]
The reason seems to be that gpgme_op_verify is used on the input (because the input is classified as a clear-signed message). And this calls gpg without --verify.
Running the same input through gpg --status-fd 2, I get
[GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 74 0 bar [GNUPG:] NEWSIG [GNUPG:] KEY_CONSIDERED 8C8AFD6AEF9F30C4F6D80CF6089F4ED80F384779 0 [GNUPG:] SIG_ID rNB9tZasKqqfLCkwTNM6ht3SjzU 2023-07-26 1690382691 [GNUPG:] KEY_CONSIDERED 8C8AFD6AEF9F30C4F6D80CF6089F4ED80F384779 0 [GNUPG:] GOODSIG 0F5BE42A23C91CE3 Test key for Key to Card <keytocard@example.net> [GNUPG:] VALIDSIG D0C16E12A3A5E7857F6FC1D30F5BE42A23C91CE3 2023-07-26 1690382691 0 4 0 1 8 01 8C8AFD6AEF9F30C4F6D80CF6089F4ED80F384779 [GNUPG:] KEY_CONSIDERED 8C8AFD6AEF9F30C4F6D80CF6089F4ED80F384779 0 [GNUPG:] TRUST_ULTIMATE 0 pgp [GNUPG:] KEYEXPIRED 1647774000 pub ed25519 2022-02-17 [SC] [revoked: 2022-03-28] 81CE7D2F992F3A1EFEE05931AEEA9B17125B177B rev AEEA9B17125B177B 2022-03-28 [selfsig] uid Jane Doe <jane.doe@example.net> sig AEEA9B17125B177B 2022-08-09 [selfsig] uid blabla sig AEEA9B17125B177B 2022-08-09 [selfsig] sub cv25519 2022-02-17 [E] [revoked: 2022-03-28] sig AEEA9B17125B177B 2022-02-17 [keybind]
which correctly prints the signed plaintext separately from the key block. So, it's probably GpgME that needs to be fixed.