There is FD_CLOFORK on Solaris 11.4 as well. It is a part of POSIX-1.2024, but who knows how long until that becomes common.

@gnibee Thanks! I noticed this too but wasn't familiar with the test suite, and didn't see an ASAN error so assumed nothing harmful. This explanation explains it.

Thanks, that was the only issue building there.

Thanks for the quick fix. I feel a bit silly for not notcing that macro myself...

@werner I think these changes caused an ASAN failure that I reported in T7664. I think it would be good to get that sorted before a release.

Hi Werner, one minor issue in this commit as can be seen by the following GCC warnings:

I can confirm this. Here is the build error:

make[2]: Entering directory '/home/collinfunk/libgcrypt-1.11.1/cipher'
`echo /bin/bash ../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..  -I../src -I../src -I../mpi -I../mpi  -I/home/collinfunk/tmp/include -g -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wall -O2 -march=rv64imafdcv -mstrict-align -c rijndael-vp-riscv.c | sed -e 's/-fsanitize[=,\-][=,a-z,A-Z,0-9,\,,\-]*//g' -e 's/-fprofile[=,\-][=,a-z,A-Z,0-9,\,,\-]*//g' -e 's/-fcoverage[=,\-][=,a-z,A-Z,0-9,\,,\-]*//g' `
libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -I../src -I../mpi -I../mpi -I/home/collinfunk/tmp/include -g -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wall -O2 -march=rv64imafdcv -mstrict-align -c rijndael-vp-riscv.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rijndael-vp-riscv.o
rijndael-vp-riscv.c:58:10: fatal error: simd-common-riscv.h: No such file or directory
   58 | #include "simd-common-riscv.h"
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1730: rijndael-vp-riscv.lo] Error 1

Patch here: https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gcrypt-devel/2025-May/005854.html

Hi Werner, I submitted a patch right after this bug report using AC_CHECK_DECLS([_sys_siglist]) [1].

Interesting, that sounds like a portable method. I am not very familiar with GPG internals, but to me that sounds like quite a bit of work. Unless there is another benefit to doing so, I don't think it is worth it just to print signal names.

Yep, I wrote a small client and server just to verify that it is functional.

Correction, the _ALL_SOURCE definition only applies if __cplusplus is defined... Strange platform...

I think you are correct.