Page MenuHome GnuPG

No connection to Keyserver possible
Open, NormalPublic

Description

Hi @ all,

in our company we are using an sks to store GnuPG Keys of our coustomers to use them for secure file transfers. This sks was running pretty well with Kleopatra Version 2.2.0-gitac229d2 (2014-08-11).

After an update to Version 3.1.3-gpg4win-3.1.4 the URL/IP of the sks is still present in settings (Format: hkp://NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN without portnumber)
but i am not able to establish a connection to the sks. Every search is unsuccessful.
Also it is no longer possible to publish a new key to the server.

From other machines still running Version 2.2.0-gitac229d2 (2014-08-11) everything is fine so i asume that there is a problem with the actual version.

cheers

Michel

Details

Version
3.1.3-gpg4win-3.1.4

Event Timeline

aheinecke added a subscriber: aheinecke.

Strange, I don't know of an issue that is related to that. There were a lot of changes to the DNS code but if you are using an IP. I've tested that using an IP works for me. I used https://192.146.137.99:443 for testing.

could you please try on the command line (cmd.exe)

gpg --search someaddress

And note the error here?

Thanks for reply.

I tried to search the keyserver from comand line. gpg --search <exact mailadress> results in follwing message:

gpg: Kein Schlüsselserver bekannt (Option --keyserver verwenden)
gpg: Suche auf dem Schlüsselserver fehlgeschlagen: Kein Schlüsselserver verfügbar

In Kleopatra settings there is still the IP from my keyserver present (see attached image). The sks webinterface is accessible from my machine and a search for the same term delivers the correct results.

aheinecke added projects: dirmngr, gnupg.
aheinecke added a subscriber: werner.

I can reproduce it if I enter your or an unknown IP address.

I think the problem is that dirmngr tries a reverse dns search for the IP:

2018-11-12 10:19:09 dirmngr[39496.10] resolve_dns_addr for '192.146.137.99': 'pgpkeys.co.uk' [already known]

Your server is of course unreachable to me. But I find the Line

2018-11-12 10:15:54 dirmngr[39496.6] can't connect to '172.29.210.4': no IP address for host

In my log interesting. No IP address for an IP address? :-)

2018-11-12 10:15:54 dirmngr[39496.6] resolve_dns_addr failed while checking '172.29.210.4': No name
2018-11-12 10:15:54 dirmngr[39496.6] can't connect to '172.29.210.4': no IP address for host
2018-11-12 10:15:54 dirmngr[39496.6] error connecting to 'http://172.29.210.4:11371': Unknown host
2018-11-12 10:15:54 dirmngr[39496.6] marking host '172.29.210.4' as dead
2018-11-12 10:15:54 dirmngr[39496.6] host '172.29.210.4' marked as dead
2018-11-12 10:15:54 dirmngr[39496.6] command 'KS_SEARCH' failed: No keyserver available

@werner ^ this is not a Windows specific thing and I don't know the dns code well.

Just registered to report pretty much the same.
I've been using gpg 2 for a long while and it's been doing just fine, up to the point where people started using keys it didn't recognise that require a later version.

I installed gpg4win 3.1.11, and lo and behold, the keys are recognised but now I no longer have key server functionality which makes it very difficult to keep using.

I checked the gnupg installed with gpg4win 3.1.11 and apparently it's gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.19 with libgcrypt 1.8.5 (at least that's what gpg --version tells me)
When trying to use keyservers in any fashion:

gpg: error searching keyserver: Server indicated a failure
gpg: keyserver search failed: Server indicated a failure

My previous installation which wasn't touched still works (using the same gnupg home as the later version since it was an upgrade), which is gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.26 (Gpg4win 2.2.3) with libgcrypt 1.6.2

gpg: searching for "aaron@eff.org" from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
(1) Aaron Jue <aaron@eff.org>

4096 bit RSA key 59AEBAC5, created: 2016-12-09, expires: 2020-12-08

(2) Aaron Mackey <amackey@eff.org>

4096 bit RSA key 33E247D4, created: 2015-09-10, expires: 2019-09-10 (expired)

(3) Aaron Jue <aaron@eff.org>

2048 bit RSA key 7B06DFFA, created: 2014-06-16, expires: 2016-10-24 (revoked) (expired)

(4) Aaron Jue <aaron@eff.org>

2048 bit RSA key 7B06DFFA, created: 2012-10-24, expires: 2016-12-12 (revoked) (expired)

Keys 1-4 of 4 for "aaron@eff.org". Enter number(s), N)ext, or Q)uit > q

I've tried several things. Using command line, using Kleopatra, using enigmail with the new version, all fail to do keyserver things. Pointing enigmail to the older gpg instance makes it work just fine. So there seems to be a bug in gpg4win 3.x and this seemed to be the best matching issue report.

@Moonchild wrote:

using enigmail with the new version

I'm not sure what version of enigmail you're using, but I think more recent versions of enigmail don't rely on GnuPG for anything to do with keyservers -- rather, enigmail uses native thunderbird javascript to interact with the keyservers.

I'm using enigmail 1.9.9 because I'm on a mail client that doesn't use WebExtensions, so it's using gnupg for keyserver stuff. In this case that means I've been able to verify it's a gnupg issue (both Kleopatra and enigmail displaying the same issue as CLI).

I'm honestly surprised this isn't being given any sort of priority.
gnupg for windows is simply broken. Even Kleopatra, its supplied and designated key management application doesn't work re: keyserver communication.

How is someone supposed to do key management without keyserver communications? Manual import and export? Requesting everyone manually send over their public keys?... Manually checking for revocations?...
Please figure out what the problem is and do something about it!

This has not been set high on the priorities, because keyserver access works for most with Gpg4win (and thus GnuPG) on windows. A recent exception has been occurred about a month ago with Let's encrypt expired root certificate. So currently for Gpg4win 3.1.16 you need to update to a newer GnuPG (Version 2.2.32 at time of writing), by installing the simple installer,e.g. https://gnupg.org/ftp/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32-2.2.32_20211006.exe

Please report if you still have problems with this combination?

If so, please additionally try the 2.3 simple installer (e.g. available from https://gnupg.org/download/index.html) instead. There have been many improvements to GnuPG (and other Gpg4win parts). The problem maybe gone by now.