Feedback from a customer was that revoking a certification is confusing because you can select keys and user ids which were not used for certification.
It would be better to show something like "there are no certifications to revoke" or automatically select the key for revocation based on the certification.
| rLIBKLEO Libkleo | |||
| rLIBKLEO2b4b07ca549e Add more convenience helpers for applying algorithms to a range | |||
| rLIBKLEO807d2eacd385 Add helper to check if all elements in a range satify a predicate | |||
| rKLEOPATRA Kleopatra | |||
| rKLEOPATRA61d79f5a440b Remove obsolete files | |||
| rKLEOPATRA6b6d314c367d Simplify the revocation of certifications | |||
| rKLEOPATRA19286cc1d152 Check if there are any certifications the user can revoke | |||
| rKLEOPATRA82d5bbb89358 Add helper to check that a user ID belongs to a key | |||
| rKLEOPATRAe3bdb94add48 Modernize the check that the user IDs belong to the key | |||
| rKLEOPATRAddaf31d30632 Log a warning if the signatures are not available | |||
If the user cannot revoke any of the certifications of the selected key or user IDs, then we now inform the user about this instead of showing the dilaog.
Further plans for improving the workflow:
Note to self: T6100: Kleopatra: Make revocation of certifications accessible may be obsolete when the improvements are completed because then the dialog will most likely be gone.
Depending on what the user selected (key, one or more user IDs, a single certification) all certifications that the user can revoke are determined and, after confirmation, are revoked one after the other.
This is how the confirmation looks like for a single certification and for multiple certifications:
