A quick fix would be to remove the link
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Fri, Dec 12
Wed, Dec 3
That RFC is Experimental anyway
Thu, Nov 27
Ok, then this is only an issue in the VSD versions. (I confirmed with a quick test with Gpg4win-5.0.0-beta413)
Nov 3 2025
Oct 30 2025
Oct 10 2025
Oct 4 2025
That is on purpose. With a signed mail you have at least a way to tell who sent the mail. An unsigned but encrypted mail can be send by anyone and you netter don't use HTML links there.
Jun 5 2025
Thanks for elaborating and the reference to rfc2440 - I now understand where that stray mail (between [RFC2822] and name-addr) in rfc4880 comes from...
Anyway, I'll treat it as if it says RFC 2822 mailbox and will treat angle brackets with bare addresses as optional.
I see, I had rfc2440 in mind which says:
By convention, it includes an RFC 822 mail name, but there are no restrictions on its content.
thus 4880 refined it a bit. But in practice it is not the same because it is utf8 and not punycode or whatever. let's close this bug because they way it is used will work with all mail clients.