oh! i suppose i underestimated the severity of it. apologies!
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Nov 19 2018
Nov 19 2018
• werner awarded T4242: Improper construction for gpg.constants.import in GPGME python bindings a Pterodactyl token.
Nov 17 2018
Nov 17 2018
brents added a comment to T4242: Improper construction for gpg.constants.import in GPGME python bindings.
Nov 5 2018
Nov 5 2018
brents added a comment to T4242: Improper construction for gpg.constants.import in GPGME python bindings.
or, more accurately so it matches the C api, perhaps gpg.constants.import_status
Dec 23 2016
Dec 23 2016
would this patch[0] be acceptable for inclusion in branch?
note from patch composer:
"""
Comment by Gaetan Bisson (vesath) - Friday, 23 December 2016, 07:22 GMT
So I came up with a fix that does two things:
- fallback on the old, standard resolver code
- if no SRV record is found, use CNAME (as expected but some weird error code
apparently broke this)
"""
[0] fetched from
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/libdns.patch?h=packages/gnupg
Dec 22 2016
Dec 22 2016