- User Since
- Mar 27 2017, 4:48 PM (165 w, 3 d)
Aug 1 2017
No, it's not. It still misses "-O" entirely.
Jul 24 2017
The fixed sed expression still does not work correctly; it misses the plain "-O" form of the option. As per gcc docs, -O is the same as -O1, and clang accepts it (and the build falls over with it) even though it does not document it at all.
Jul 9 2015
Yes, it does. Thanks!
Jul 5 2015
Nonsense, e76d4c05b24211f3981ab69cddb3fccc17d21e0e it is. Sorry, copied wrong