No, it's not. It still misses "-O" entirely.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Aug 1 2017
Aug 1 2017
chrullrich added a comment to T3293: libgcrypt: warning: unknown pragma "#pragma GCC optimize" ignored => compile failure with LLVM 5.0.
Jul 24 2017
Jul 24 2017
chrullrich added a comment to T3293: libgcrypt: warning: unknown pragma "#pragma GCC optimize" ignored => compile failure with LLVM 5.0.
The fixed sed expression still does not work correctly; it misses the plain "-O" form of the option. As per gcc docs, -O is the same as -O1, and clang accepts it (and the build falls over with it) even though it does not document it at all.
Jul 9 2015
Jul 9 2015
Yes, it does. Thanks!
Jul 5 2015
Jul 5 2015
Nonsense, e76d4c05b24211f3981ab69cddb3fccc17d21e0e it is. Sorry, copied wrong
line.