Sorry, I can't resist to quote Knuth from his homepage:

A note on email versus e-mail

Newly coined nonce words of English are often spelled with a hyphen, but the hyphen disappears when the words become widely used. For example, people used to write “non-zero” and “soft-ware” instead of “nonzero” and “software”; the same trend has occurred for hundreds of other words. Thus it's high time for everybody to stop using the archaic spelling “e-mail”. Think of how many keystrokes you will save in your lifetime if you stop now! The form “email” has been well established in England for several years, so I am amazed to see Americans being overly conservative in this regard. (Of course, “email” has been a familiar word in France, Germany, and the Netherlands much longer than in England --- but for an entirely different reason.)

Thus pretty please use email.

Please name the smartcard tab column Slot and use Smartcard instead of Token. Most users either have a “Smartcard” or a “Yubikey” and they don't known what we mean by “Token”.

Actually, it seems to be spelled "smart card" in English (e.g. in Merriam Webster and Oxford English Dictionary). Two words. It's just us ignorant Germans who like to glue words together as if there's no tomorrow.

Please see the quote from Knuth which explains this.

"Holder" doesn't exist for anything but OpenPGP cards and many people may not set it. Hence, I think it makes little sense to show this in a prominent location if it's empty for most users who don't juggle with loads of OpenPGP cards.

In T7237#189558, @ikloecker wrote:

"Holder" doesn't exist for anything but OpenPGP cards and many people may not set it. Hence, I think it makes little sense to show this in a prominent location if it's empty for most users who don't juggle with loads of OpenPGP cards.

I was trying to think of "why would I want to look at that?" What information could I gleam that would help me decrypt / verify or encrypt / sign something. And I thought well, if I know enough of the smartcard to have the stubs with the Owner / Holder (I assume that means the same thing) then that could be useful. To see which of the subkeys lie on which smartcard. Since here the connection is from one certificate to potentially multiple smartcards. E.g. Related to persons: Who has the projects supersmartcard at the moment. Or e.g. This key is on card "Codesigning 3" or so.

But since this is also covered by Token and since Token is more generic. I can agree with you not to show it prominently, I like it for OpenPGP because I can freely define it.

https://invent.kde.org/pim/kleopatra/-/merge_requests/272 and https://invent.kde.org/pim/libkleo/-/merge_requests/126

Backported for VSD 3.3

Gpg4win 4.4:
Contrary to the task description are:
a) In the certifications tab the "tags" column is shown by default
b) in the UID tab, the "origin" column is shown by default (only the "tags" column is hidden)

I'm not sure if we should leave it like this anyway and fix the task description accordingly. Though I find it unintuitive to show the tags by default in one tab and not the other. And the origin is not that relevant here

"Tags" are stored with certifications. Therefore, I think it's useful and makes sense to show the Tags column in the Certifications view.

ok, then we leave it in the certifications tab like it is.
What about the Uid tab? Keep it like it is, which is: Name, Email, Trust Level, Origin, [Tags] ?
While I do not think that the origin need to be shown by default, I don't think it's really a problem, as this is the last column

https://invent.kde.org/pim/kleopatra/-/merge_requests/337

Backported the latest change for VSD 3.3