Libraries have been fixed (as well as GnuPG itself), so, closing.

Fixed in 1.12.1.

rG62b8bf2f introduced the regression. The intent of the fix was about comparison of -----END , which has nine characters.
But it also added afx->buffer_pos ==1, that affected.

Applied the change in: rK86c6e972421a: Fix a memory leak in _ksba_ber_decoder_decode.

Fixed in 1.12.0.

Fixed in libgpg-error 1.59.

Like this patch?

I found a possible leak and a possible access of freed memory.

@thesamesam Thanks a lot.
I managed to replicate the failure somehow (for me, it fails at the importing the key).

Please tell us the information of your environment.
What the versions of gpg and gpg-agent?

Here is an attempt of mine this week:

diff --git a/g10/call-agent.c b/g10/call-agent.c
index 5e13a3e52..8949fad17 100644
--- a/g10/call-agent.c
+++ b/g10/call-agent.c
@@ -3290,13 +3290,14 @@ confirm_status_cb (void *opaque, const char *line)
    message.  If FORCE is true the agent is advised not to ask for
    confirmation. */
 gpg_error_t
-agent_delete_key (ctrl_t ctrl, const char *hexkeygrip, const char *desc,
+agent_delete_key (ctrl_t ctrl, const char *keygrip, const char *desc,
                   int force)
 {
   gpg_error_t err;
   char line[ASSUAN_LINELENGTH];
   struct default_inq_parm_s dfltparm;
   struct confirm_parm_s confirm_parm;
+  const char *keygrip2 = NULL;

The fix causes a regression. Reported: https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2026-February/036218.html

This is not 2.5-only.

No, OpenBSD's implementation of POSIX semaphore is different to NetBSD.
(It doesn't support PSHARED=1.)

Possibly, it is related to the NetBSD failure of T8065.
If importing the secret key fails (which invokes gpg-agent), decryption cannot be succeeded.
I will check OpenBSD implementation of POSIX semaphore, if it's similar to NetBSD one.

Investigating GNU ld, I learned that there is no easy way (~= no way) to suppress the warnings (other than 2>/dev/null). It was implemented by the special section named gnu.warning.SYM where SYM is a symbol. I think that this is not-so-good for glibc to notify its users about possible static link problem, by gnu.warning.SYM.

I found two issues in libgpg-error for spawning functions.

POSIX documentation never says that PSHARED=0 prevents sharing among processes. In my opinion, it still conforms to POSIX even when a PSHARED=0 semaphore can be shared between parent and child processes.

In tests/migrations, (unlike tests/openpgp and tests/cms), the tests do not prepare gpg-agent, but it is gpg which invokes gpg-agent if needed.
Because of that, on NetBSD (where POSIX semaphore has a different semantics), it hangs with gpg --list-secret-key, when gpg tries to spawn the gpg-agent process.
In the old code of 2.4, it simply ignores about the npth_protect and npth_unprotect sequence when calling fork to spawn a process.
New code in libgpg-error cares about npth_protect and npth_unprotect sequence but it was not sufficient; We need to care about NetBSD's semantics. Child process should not call npth_protect. With shared semantics, child process's calling npth_protect affects to cause parent process: it hangs.

@wiz Thank you for your quick feedback.

Thank you for the log.