Yesterday
I do not claim I understand anything of this assembler syntax :)
Lets implement it for 2.3
For the second, I wonder if newer xlclang++ compiler works with 1.9.
Thank you for the bug report.
Pushed the change.
Mon, May 16
Thanks for your confirmation.
Sat, May 14
Okay, confirmed: I was just wrong and the build failure was only ever with --disable-asm (i.e. the log in this bug is the only relevant one). Patch works.
Fri, May 13
Ok. Thank you for the clarification. I will drop the second part and keep only the FIPS change in the patch. Merge request already updated.
Thanks. Should be applied.
I can imagine thar there are use cases for this. Thus I see no problems for the first part.
Thu, May 12
Wed, May 11
Tue, May 10
Pushed the change. Also, it's backported to 1.10 branch.
Thanks for creating this ticket. I'll reply.
libgcrypt 1.10 is out with the API change for Windows, and we don't see any report (yet).
Pushed the change to master.
Mon, May 9
GCC 11.3 and GCC 12.1 are out with the fix.
Fri, May 6
Thu, May 5
When we implemented this first, Libgcrypt had no appropriate KDF support. I recall that I considered to change this but it turned out the for 2.2 the changes are too large. For 2.3 we will consider such a change.
Wed, May 4
Tue, May 3
Mon, Apr 25
Wed, Apr 20
Feedback from the lab is that they'd recommend returning a specific error code that indicates that the prime search failed and then relying on the caller to decide whether to loop or bubble up the error. I'm not sure who we would consider to be the "caller" of the relevant generation function in this case, though.
Full ack.
Here is my proposal patch:
diff --git a/random/random-drbg.c b/random/random-drbg.c index 5a46fd92..f1cfe286 100644 --- a/random/random-drbg.c +++ b/random/random-drbg.c @@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ enum drbg_prefixes * Global variables ***************************************************************/