Ah, ok, thanks for the info!
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Aug 13 2021
Jan 19 2018
Jul 13 2017
Likely fixed by commit a4d1595a2638db63ac4c73e722c8ba95fdd85ff7 (rijndael-aesni: split assembly block to ease register pressure) in 1.7 branch (and included in 1.7.3+).
Compiler bug. Probably misdetection of aesni support in old AMD processors?
Mar 30 2017
Feb 4 2017
Jan 25 2017
I have now learnt how GCC uses 'undefined behavior' for aggressive optimization
and that this could break code doing unaligned accesses even on x86. So this
needs to be fixed after all.
Apr 26 2016
Mar 29 2016
Thus clang is wrong here because it prints an "error" and not something like a
"performance hint". I close this bug.
Mar 25 2016
Current code is perfectly fine as crc-intel-pclmul.c is i386/amd64-only source
file and that target architecture can handle unaligned loads.
Mar 24 2016
Jan 30 2012
1.4.12 has been released.
Jan 3 2012
Jul 4 2011
Fixed but not tested with commit 6daa9db; to be released in 1.4.12.
Jul 1 2011
Dec 10 2009
Mar 2 2009
Dec 8 2008
Given the proposed workaround, I'd say we don't fix that.
Dec 5 2008
Sep 30 2008
Sep 8 2008
Jul 30 2008
Nov 14 2007
Did you run "make distclean" before trying with --disable-asm?
I'll check the OS detection.
Did you run "make distclean" before trying with --disable-asm?
I'll check the OS detection.
Feb 24 2007
Jan 3 2007
Insufficient information to analyze.