Mon, May 18
Wed, May 13
Thu, May 7
Sun, Apr 26
Apr 16 2026
Reporter has tested 2.5 - the code in 2.2 is identical; no need for separate testing
I reworked the reading using our dedicated line reading functions which is used at other places. Extra benefit is that the code now also prints a status line ERROR which gives information on the first faulty line. Thus gpg-connect-agent listtrusted /bye can be sued to quickly check for errors without configuring a log file.
Without GpgsmCompatibility set and with the trust in the Root-CA established in the global trustlist file (the local one does not work for vs-complicane without GpgsmCompatibility=de-vs-trustlist , as expected), the compliance of a signature or decryption is now shown correctly and in accordance with the certificate status shown in Kleopatra. If the Root-CA is only trusted locally, the certificate and the signature are shown as "certified" resp. "not-compliant".
In short: everything works as expected if GpgsmCompatibility is not set.
auto-key-upload should not be triggered on revocation cert import, so everything seems fine.
Looks good to me on vsd-3.3.7-beta90.9 @ win10.
Note: Keyserver has to start with ldap: for this to work, otherwise it is silently ignored.
Apr 15 2026
In general looks good to me on vsd-3.3.90.9 / gpg 2.2.54-beta4.
with GnuPG-VS-Desktop-3.3.90.9-Beta-Standard gpgsm now never shows the line [GNUPG:] VERIFICATION_COMPLIANCE_MODE 23. Therefore Kleopatra always shows "not VS compliant" now on verification and decryption. Even though the certificate is shown a VS-compliant in the list an when encryping:
gnupg22 received this patch meanwhile: rG7bc969d388086b4f3aeee3c5389b7baf055689d7
Apr 14 2026
Apr 8 2026
@werner I can confirm that we've tested the patch and it seems to fix the issue in our setup.
Apr 7 2026
Applied to master to be release with 2.5.19.
Mar 31 2026
2.2.53 was released wit VSD 3.3.6
Mar 23 2026
But the original patch rG1b4ac98de7db: agent: Accept a trustlist with a missing LF at the end. was not working to allow missing newlines in gpg4win-5.0.0 @ win11?
Mar 19 2026
That change is too complex for just getting a proper error message. The original patch covers the most common case.
This should also be fixed in 2.2 and 2.4 (if neccessary)
