Page MenuHome GnuPG

needs discussionPolicy
ActivePublic

Members

  • This project does not have any members.
  • View All

Watchers

  • This project does not have any watchers.
  • View All

Details

Description

Needs to be discussed…

Recent Activity

Tue, Feb 3

timegrid added a comment to T8077: Kleopatra: Bold appearance for qualified signatures might be confusing for public and non-signing keys.

The display in Okular is independent from Kleopatra, so dropping it in Kleopatra should be fine.
If a QES certificate is available, Okular should highlight and add a filter for them (which is currently not working, see T6632: Okular: Highlight / preselect "nonRepudiation" certificates for qualified signatures)

Tue, Feb 3, 1:34 PM · needs discussion, S/MIME, vsd34, gpd5x, kleopatra
ebo added a comment to T8077: Kleopatra: Bold appearance for qualified signatures might be confusing for public and non-signing keys.

I currently have a slight preference to drop bold and go with normal font. Werner would be ok with that, too.

Tue, Feb 3, 1:17 PM · needs discussion, S/MIME, vsd34, gpd5x, kleopatra
timegrid updated subscribers of T8077: Kleopatra: Bold appearance for qualified signatures might be confusing for public and non-signing keys.

@svuorela said, QES certs shouldn't be required to be on a smartcard.

Tue, Feb 3, 12:20 PM · needs discussion, S/MIME, vsd34, gpd5x, kleopatra
ikloecker added a comment to T8077: Kleopatra: Bold appearance for qualified signatures might be confusing for public and non-signing keys.

Using an icon for QES certificates isn't that easy because we use an icon for smartcard certificates and any list item can have at most one icon. Moreover, QES certificates are very like stored on a smartcard (isn't that even a requirement?), i.e. an icon clash is basically guaranteed.

Tue, Feb 3, 11:49 AM · needs discussion, S/MIME, vsd34, gpd5x, kleopatra
timegrid added a comment to T8077: Kleopatra: Bold appearance for qualified signatures might be confusing for public and non-signing keys.

In T6632: Okular: Highlight / preselect "nonRepudiation" certificates for qualified signatures I had the impression, that some hint is useful for signing operations. Probably not so much in general.

Tue, Feb 3, 11:04 AM · needs discussion, S/MIME, vsd34, gpd5x, kleopatra
ebo added a comment to T8077: Kleopatra: Bold appearance for qualified signatures might be confusing for public and non-signing keys.

Highlighting QES is mostly useful for Okular, I guess.
Maybe use a symbol with a pen? That should be self-explanatory.

Tue, Feb 3, 10:44 AM · needs discussion, S/MIME, vsd34, gpd5x, kleopatra
ebo triaged T8077: Kleopatra: Bold appearance for qualified signatures might be confusing for public and non-signing keys as Normal priority.
Tue, Feb 3, 10:40 AM · needs discussion, S/MIME, vsd34, gpd5x, kleopatra
timegrid added a project to T8077: Kleopatra: Bold appearance for qualified signatures might be confusing for public and non-signing keys: needs discussion.
Tue, Feb 3, 10:30 AM · needs discussion, S/MIME, vsd34, gpd5x, kleopatra

Fri, Jan 23

timegrid changed the status of T6612: Kleopatra can't be started from the gpg shell of the AppImage, a subtask of T6630: Platform independent starter, from Open to Testing.
Fri, Jan 23, 11:31 AM · needs discussion, gpd5x, Windows, Feature Request, AppImage
timegrid edited projects for T6630: Platform independent starter, added: gpd5x, needs discussion; removed Restricted Project.
Fri, Jan 23, 11:28 AM · needs discussion, gpd5x, Windows, Feature Request, AppImage

Thu, Jan 8

ebo added a project to T6793: Cleanup temporary files / dirs with decrypted content: needs discussion.
Thu, Jan 8, 10:58 AM · needs discussion, gpd5x, kleopatra
ebo created needs discussion.
Thu, Jan 8, 10:58 AM