Hartmut, please read Andre's mail again - we can't do anything about it if Outlook considers an extra delay of 20ms as too slow.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Dec 11 2020
Andre,
thats wrong.
if i disable the Addin, the effect is gone.
Best regards
Hartmut
Von: aheinecke (Andre Heinecke) <noreply@dev.gnupg.org>
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Dezember 2020 08:35
An: hartmut.jacobi@hotmail.de
Betreff: [Task] [Closed] T5176: Problem with Office 365 GnuPG Outlook addin, Outlook reports not to be primary Mail client
aheinecke closed this task as "Invalid".
aheinecke added a comment.
Hi, you can change the default mail app under systemsettings in windwos 10, this has nothing to do with GpgOL, and the delayed start report, I can't do anything about. Outlook just shows this for any COM Addin to shift the blame, seriously we took 0,02s or 20ms on your system for our initialization. That is reasonably fast.
TASK DETAIL
https://dev.gnupg.org/T5176
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://dev.gnupg.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: aheinecke
Cc: aheinecke, gnupg, HackyJ, Neurone, ccharabaruk, gp_ast
This is an automated email from the GnuPG development hub. If you have registered in the past at https://bugs.gnupg.org/ your account was migrated automatically. You can visit https://dev.gnupg.org/ to set a new password and update your email preferences.
Hi, you can change the default mail app under systemsettings in windwos 10, this has nothing to do with GpgOL, and the delayed start report, I can't do anything about. Outlook just shows this for any COM Addin to shift the blame, seriously we took 0,02s or 20ms on your system for our initialization. That is reasonably fast.
Dec 10 2020
There's a wildcard CNAME, it's not _really_ configured. It's not a good assumption that a CNAME == configured and it doesn't have a reasonable fallback, IMHO.
If you configure the subdomain in the DNS this will be used. Thus get a cert for it. The old method should not be used and thus if the openpgpkey subdomain exists gpg concludes that the admin is aware of the new scheme.
Hm, I don't want to remove the CNAME just so that GPG WKD would work, is there a way to fix this? Is there a good reason why after "Advanced"/subdomain lookup it doesn't try "direct"?
Oh, it's using the openpgpkey subdomain because of the CNAME but that's not actually being served by the server.
Dec 6 2020
Thank you very much
Select your key in the certificate view, click right, select "Backup Secret keys ...", store to a file. Then copy that file in a secure why (USB stick etc) to the new box, import it there.
Nov 29 2020
Nov 18 2020
I am sorry, but this is not a help desk but a bug tracker. See https://gpg4win.org or https://gnupg.org to find out which community support is available.
Nov 12 2020
Please ask on a mailing list - this is a bug tracker and somehow expects bug descriptions.
Dec 2 2019
This is a support question. Please use one of the public support channels as listed at gnupg.org or ask for a quote at a commercial service (https://gnupg.org/service.html).
Jan 19 2018
Jan 12 2018
Let me comment this
I am sharing completed info, please look into it, at may I know the cause
gpg: enabled debug flags: lookup
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: 1 search descriptions:
gpg: DBG: keydb_search 0: SUBSTR: 'JPMCBANK_GPG_PROD_2020'
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: searching keybox (resource 0 of 1)
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: searched keybox (resource 0 of 1) => Success
gpg: DBG: finish_lookup: checking key 88BEBD28 (all)(req_usage=1)
gpg: DBG: checking subkey 022E17B7
gpg: DBG: subkey might be fine
gpg: DBG: using key 022E17B7
gpg: using subkey F423A07D022E17B7 instead of primary key 9D09927E88BEBD28
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: 1 search descriptions:
gpg: DBG: keydb_search 0: SUBSTR: 'JPMCBANK_GPG_UAT_2019'
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: searching keybox (resource 0 of 1)
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: 1 search descriptions:
gpg: DBG: keydb_search 0: LONG_KID: 'BFFCAF61B48701FD'
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: searching keybox (resource 0 of 1)
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: searched keybox (resource 0 of 1) => Success
gpg: DBG: finish_lookup: checking key B48701FD (all)(req_usage=0)
gpg: DBG: using key B48701FD
gpg: using pgp trust model
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: searched keybox (resource 0 of 1) => Success
gpg: DBG: finish_lookup: checking key B48701FD (all)(req_usage=2)
gpg: DBG: checking subkey 403048E0
gpg: DBG: usage does not match: want=2 have=1
gpg: DBG: no suitable subkeys found - trying primary
gpg: DBG: primary key usage does not match: want=2 have=5
gpg: DBG: no suitable key found - giving up
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: 1 search descriptions:
gpg: DBG: keydb_search 0: SUBSTR: 'JPMCBANK_GPG_UAT_2019'
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: searching keybox (resource 0 of 1)
gpg: DBG: keydb_search: searched keybox (resource 0 of 1) => EOF
gpg: JPMCBANK_GPG_UAT_2019: skipped: Unusable public key
gpg: E:\New\steps.txt: sign+encrypt failed: Unusable public key
gpg: secmem usage: 1376/32768 bytes in 3 blocks
Jan 11 2018
Jan 8 2018
You might want to look at: https://wiki.gnupg.org/TroubleShooting#Passphrase_on_the_command_line
Jan 2 2018
Jul 13 2017
Without more information, we can not act on this.
Mar 30 2017
Mar 20 2017
Feb 13 2017
Please ask on the gnupg-users at gnupg.org mailing list for help. Note that you
do not need to subscribe but just a wait a bit until our moderators will approve
your mail. But anyway here is a quick hint in case you did not already tried:
$ gpg --card-edit
gpg/card> admin
gpg/card> factory-reset
Jan 23 2017
Sep 19 2016
This is an issue of GNOME as packaged by Red Hat. Please file a bug in Red
Hat's bug tracker instead.
I don't have sufficient permission to upgrade gnome session, so if you have
any idea suggest me
Use a recent gnome version and you are fine.
Aug 16 2016
This seems to be a general question on how to use the software. Please read the
HOWTOS at gnupg.org and if you still have questions ask at the gnupg-users
mailing list.
Jun 13 2016
scdaemon is part of GnuPG.
OpenSC is entirely unrelated to GnuPG.
Please take this to a mailing list (e.g. gnupg-users)
Jun 6 2016
Ah sorry I understood you were saying the bug is in OpenSC. Where can I report
to scdaemon? I can't find it.
Jun 5 2016
FireFox is not GnuPG and does not support the OpenPGP card.
As I said, the card may work with gpgsm because I once developed support for the
Belgian eID card. But it is likely to need some tweaking (gnupg/scd/app-p15.c)
I saw that it says not supported, but DNIe is actually supported. I can use it
flawlessly with Firefox for instance.
Please see:
https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/wiki/DNIe-%28OpenDNIe%29#update-2013-08-27
https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/issues/774#issuecomment-222468916
Thanks!
Jun 4 2016
Jun 1 2016
May 11 2016
Please ask on the gnupg-users mailibng list for help.
May 10 2016
Apr 8 2016
With GnuPG 2.1 and a recent ssh versions you can keep the private key on the
local machine but use it on the remote machine for decrytpion or signing.
Checkout --extra-socket in the gpg-agent man page. This is not possible with 2.0.
I am sorry, but this is a bug tracker and not a help line.
Please ask on the gnupg-users mailing lists:
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Jan 14 2016
Dec 18 2015
Please ask on the gnupg-users mailing list.
Dec 11 2015
Please do not open another bug but comment on the very same bug you posted a few
days ago (issue2166).
In any case, this is a question and not appropriate for a bug tracker. Use one
of the mailing lists for such questions or see https://gnupg.org/service.html
for commercial support offers.
Duplicate of T2166