I've just pushed a branch dkg/no-skel-files which implements this change.

Can you try with --standard-resolver ?

I just merged the current git head over on zelenka, which includes b83903f59ec5d49ac579f263da70ebc8dc3645b5, and managed to still get the same segfaults.

fwiw, this remains a problem on 2.1.20: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnupg2&arch=s390x&ver=2.1.20-1&stamp=1491409561&raw=0

I don't have one of these systems handy to test with, but if the fix in dee026d7 does what it says it does, this sounds like it's probably OK to close in my book. if there are more problems, i'm sure we can re-open it.

Sure:

I've now pulled from the current master head
(caf00915532e6e8e509738962964edcd14fb0654), rebuilt on zelenka with -O0 -g, and
triggered the error again, causing a core file to be dumped.

I copied gpgscm-gdb.py into tests/gpgscm/ , added it to add-auto-load-safe-path
in ~/.gdbinit, and then ran "gdb -c tests/gpgscm/core tests/gpgscm/gpgscm" and
tried to print a, as requested. here's what i got:

0 (sid_s390x-dchroot)dkg@zelenka:~/src/gnupg2/gnupg2/build$ echo
add-auto-load-safe-path
/home/dkg/src/gnupg2/gnupg2/build/tests/gpgscm/gpgscm-gdb.py > /home/dkg/.gdbinit
0 (sid_s390x-dchroot)dkg@zelenka:~/src/gnupg2/gnupg2/build$ gdb -c
tests/gpgscm/core ./tests/gpgscm/gpgscm

GNU gdb (Debian 7.12-6) 7.12.0.20161007-git
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < GPL license >
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "s390x-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
< GDB Bugs >.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
< GDB Documentation >.
For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from ./tests/gpgscm/gpgscm...done.
[New LWP 7145]
Core was generated by `./gpgscm ../../../tests/gpgscm/t-child.scm'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x000002aae4ecf748 in is_vector (p=0x4634508) at
../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:220
220 INTERFACE INLINE int is_vector(pointer p) { return (type(p)==T_VECTOR); }
(gdb) bt
#0 0x000002aae4ecf748 in is_vector (p=0x4634508) at
../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:220
#1 0x000002aae4ed3470 in vector_elem (vec=0x4634508, ielem=7) at
../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:1349
#2 0x000002aae4ed975e in tailstack_flatten (sc=0x2ab046296f0,
tailstack=0x4634508, i=8, n=7, acc=0x2ab04629838) at
../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:3117
#3 0x000002aae4ed99d4 in callstack_flatten (sc=0x2ab046296f0, i=8, n=7,
acc=0x2ab04629838) at ../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:3155
#4 0x000002aae4ed9af0 in history_flatten (sc=0x2ab046296f0) at
../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:3173
#5 0x000002aae4ed8488 in _Error_1 (sc=0x2ab046296f0, s=0x2aae4efe634 "eval:
unbound variable:", a=0x2ab0462bdd8) at ../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:2777
#6 0x000002aae4eda162 in opexe_0 (sc=0x2ab046296f0, op=OP_EVAL) at
../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:3298
#7 0x000002aae4ee3ef0 in Eval_Cycle (sc=0x2ab046296f0, op=OP_T0LVL) at
../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:5358
#8 0x000002aae4ee5384 in scheme_load_named_file (sc=0x2ab046296f0,
fin=0x2ab04684f90, filename=0x2ab04684d80 "../../../tests/gpgscm/init.scm") at
../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:5748
#9 0x000002aae4ec1ec6 in load (sc=0x2ab046296f0, file_name=0x2aae4efc7d4
"init.scm", lookup_in_cwd=0, lookup_in_path=1) at ../../../tests/gpgscm/main.c:180
#10 0x000002aae4ec22cc in main (argc=0, argv=0x3ffffe44e48) at
../../../tests/gpgscm/main.c:266
(gdb) up 5
#5 0x000002aae4ed8488 in _Error_1 (sc=0x2ab046296f0, s=0x2aae4efe634 "eval:
unbound variable:", a=0x2ab0462bdd8) at ../../../tests/gpgscm/scheme.c:2777
2777 history = history_flatten(sc);
(gdb) print a
$1 = (pointer) 0x2ab0462bdd8
(gdb) print *a
$2 = define-macro
(gdb)

maybe i'm doing something wrong? i'll ask and see whether i can give out an
account on the porterbox for you, justus.

Roundup won't let me include the details, but i will say that from a git bisect,
i discovered that the first commit that has this behavior is
49e2ae65e892f93be7f87cfaae3392b50a99e4b1 ("gpgscm: Use a compact vector
representation.")

The crashes that happen are segfaults.

This bug report simply asks to solve the generic problem of GNUPGHOME being
larger than sun_path. Justus's proposed mechanism is only one way of solving
that problem.

Another proposed mechanism is what i originally proposed in T2964 (dkg on Feb 17 2017, 01:52 AM / Roundup), which
*does* address remote filesystems and re-mounted filesystems.

I don't undertstand the critique about the code not yet being mature. Code
doesn't become mature by not being written, it needs to be written first and
then tested in order to become mature.

Lastly, i think if we expect that /run/user/$(id -u)/ is a "simple dependency"
for building other software, we need to make that expectation explicit someplace
reasonable (e.g. doc/HACKING or something similar)

Justus, thanks for this work, it's great!. If we can solve the problem by doing
more clever socket(7) manipulation, that would be a big win.

How do you propose dealing with the getsockname() variations? or should we just
forbid the use of getsockname() entirely in the gnupg codebase?

Yes, notmuch decided that they needed to workaround the situation anyway,
because they're in an environment that doesn't create the standard per-user
rundir. That doesn't seem like a great argument that gpg should also fail in
environments where the standard per-user rundir is available. I can demonstrate
a number of environments where gpg or its daemons will fail, but i don't think
any of them justify forcing gpg or its daemons to *also* fail when those
environments aren't present.

In answer to your nitpick, here is evidence that gpg's daemons cannot create
their sockets when the GNUPGHOME is too long:

1 dkg@alice:~$ mkdir -m 0700
/home/dkg/tmp/very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-long
0 dkg@alice:~$
GNUPGHOME=/home/dkg/tmp/very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-very-long
gpgconf --launch dirmngr
gpgconf: error running '/usr/bin/gpg-connect-agent': exit status 1
gpgconf: error running '/usr/bin/gpg-connect-agent --dirmngr NOP': General error
1 dkg@alice:~$

Are you using tor? if so, is your tor daemon up and running, and actively
connecting to the outside world?

Thanks, i've pushed this back to python-gnupg folks, and they've accepted it:

https://bitbucket.org/vinay.sajip/python-gnupg/commits/d0375e034da3efa6fbda713cb4bde0fbb6d3b158

so i think we can consider this issue resolved, at least from 2.1.14 and onward,
where import-show was introduced.

Thanks for these fixes! I'm not sure i understand why ptr lookups are needed
for keyserver --hosttable. Can we drop those too?

This sounds like issues we were seeing in debian, which i believe have been
fixed in git already.

we're shipping the following two patches in debian against 2.1.18:

https://sources.debian.net/src/gnupg2/2.1.18-6/debian/patches/0028-scd-Backport-two-fixes-from-master.patch/
https://sources.debian.net/src/gnupg2/2.1.18-6/debian/patches/0029-scd-Fix-use-case-of-PC-SC.patch/

I note that even if i drop the "--trust-model tofu+pgp" and subsequently invoke
just "gpg --tofu-default-policy ask --fingerprint" i get the same crash.

however, if i just execute that in a fresh homedir without ever having set
"--trust-model tofu+pgp" i don't get a crash. so there is some sort of state
being set up that is then tickling the assertion later.

I'll just note that the only programmatic unattended uses i've seen have been
*not* decryption. they're attempts to list a keyring. So switching to
decrypted mode there will provide the same amount of breakage as requiring an
explicit command, but without the benefit of requiring explicit intent.

Any variation in behavior between automated and "attended" use is a debugging
pain point that actually seems to create work in the rest of the ecosystem. The
more GnuPG can keep its rules and behavior simple to understand, the better.

right, the configuration is not an error, but a different way of handling the
DNS lookups.

just to clarify: this change means that dirmngr will continue to use libdns in
the event of finding no understood directives in nsswitch.conf. it is *not* the
equivalent of falling back to standard-resolver. right? If that's correct,
then i agree that an extra warning is probably too much noise.

Right, agreed -- there is no way to get to the "improved --list-packets" without
using the dubious approach of not specifying a command at all.

I agree that a hard failure when --batch is given without an explicit command
would be reasonable (though that means we will be effectively breaking
python-gnupg and others like it, which do try to use it). I'm not sure i
understand the reasoning behind a hard failure for --with-colons without an
explicit command.

looks reasonable to me, though i haven't tried it myself (my nsswitch.conf
doesn't have the initial property reported).

Perhaps there should be an additional explicit log message for the
!ld.resolv_conf->lookup[0] case since dirmngr is falling back?

So i'm left a little confused here about what the resolution is. neal added
documentation, but ueno suggested it was wrong and contributed a patch for it.
However, that patch hasn't been applied.

Some additional questions about pinentry-emacs and INSIDE_EMACS that came up in
discussion over on https://bugs.debian.org/854797:

    What's the best way to debug a problem when emacs pinentry
    isn't working?  do we look at gpg?  gpg-agent?  pinentry? emacs itself?
    all of those places?  What happens when the user has two separate
    instances of emacs running?  What if there's an instance of emacs
    running and someone uses tramp to connect to a remote ssh server, and
    gpg-agent is providing the ssh-agent interface?  What if someone uses
    ssh from *outside* of emacs and it talks to a gpg-agent that was
    auto-launched from within an emacs session?  What about when there's an
    instance of emacs running in a graphical session on a machine where the
    same user is also logged into the machine via ssh, and they're using a
    different graphical session?  how does pinentry-emacs interact with
    emacs --daemon and multiple emacsclient instances?

Another few questions:

Why does emacs use /tmp/emacs$UID for the ephemeral socket instead of

/run/user/$UID ?

If OPTION allow-pinentry-emacs is set, but the emacs process isn't

repsonsive (or nothing is listening at all) should pinentry do a second layer of
fallback, e.g. to curses?

The unnecessary PTR lookup is causing problems for other people too, over on
https://bugs.debian.org/854359

I agree about that race condition being an important thing to consider, but i
think it's orthogonal to whether the process is self-terminating.

That is: we need to consider that race condition even in the case of deliberate
shutdown too, right?

Do we have a test case that involves two concurrent processes, one that tries to
stop the agent, and the other that tries to access it?

Sorry: to clarify my previous remark: i don't think gpg should change from its
current behavior during *encryption*. I do think it should be more constrained
in its output during *decryption*.

I don't think it's a problem that the files created during encryption simply
obey the umask.

I do think that when gpg creates sensitive data, though, it should limit the
mode of its output to the mode of its input (filtered by the umask, of course)

if the mode of the input is INMODE, and the umask is UMASK, during decryption,
when gpg creates an output file, it should set the mode to (INMODE & ~UMASK).

(if gpg is decrypting and sending output to stdout, perhaps it wants to try
fchmod (1, INMODE & ~UMASK) as well?)

anyone skilled in qt want to fix this outstanding issue?

I've tested Simon's patch against 2.1.18, and i think it's the right thing. I
posted it to the mailing list in git-format-patch form here:

https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2017-February/032547.html

Any progress on this?

A reproducer, even without smartcards (please ensure that GNUPGHOME is
explicitly set):

ARGS="--pinentry-mode loopback --passphrase abc123"
ARGS="$ARGS --batch --with-colons --with-keygrip --status-fd 3"

gpg $ARGS --quick-gen test@example.org rsa cert 3>genkey.status
FPR=$(awk '/KEY_CREATED/{ print $4 }' < genkey.status)
gpg $ARGS --quick-add-key 0x$FPR rsa sign 3>addkey-1.status
sleep 5
gpg $ARGS --quick-add-key 0x$FPR rsa sign 3>addkey-2.status
GRIP=$(gpg $ARGS --list-keys | grep ^grp: | cut -f10 -d: | tail -n1)
mv $GNUPGHOME/private-keys-v1.d/$GRIP.,bak
gpg-connect-agent killagent /bye
echo test | gpg $ARGS -u "$FPR" --clear-sign

This was included in 2.0.30, but somehow was missing from the 2.1.x branch.
I've included it in master as of 8a9d4b55b09d04482b46055f0a60f01b86738df3

Any thoughts or progress on this?

the reason "no public key" is confusing is because gpgv already knows that there
can be no public key. So the message that the naive user needs to see in this
case is "no keyring available".

If there is at least one keyring available, then saying something like "no
public key found in keyrings X and Y and Z" is reasonable. but if there are no
keyrings at all, the message should just be something like "no keyring found to
validate signature against".

Thanks for this work (and sorry to have just blindly/wrongly assumed that
--no-use-tor already existed without checking it).

On modern debian systems, the default tor daemon will always be listening on
unix domain socket /run/tor/socks. So a simple attempt to connect to that
socket should be sufficient -- it should fail immediately if the socket isn't
present or if no one is listening on it.

This seems cheap and fast enough to be able to do it on every query to me,
rather than introducing additional runtime state to dirmngr. just try to
connect, and if it doesn't work, fall back to a normal connection (you'd want to
do that anyway in case the tor daemon goes away after dirmngr had been launched).

thanks for the quick fix, Justus. I can confirm that this fixes the problem for me.

for cases (1), (2), and (3) it sounds like you don't need the PTR at all. right?

For your case (4), i think we should reject hkps via literal IP addresses. It's
not a real-world use case, and if you want to test/experiment with hkps as a
developer, you should have at least the capacity to edit /etc/hosts (or whatever
your system's equivalent is). Anyway, trying to support this case for the
purposes of debugging doesn't make sense if support for this case is the cause
of the bugs in the first place ;)

re: duplicate hosts: I live in a part of the world where dual-stack
connectivity is sketchy at best. And, when connecting to things over Tor, it's
possible that connections to IPv4 hosts will have a different failure rate than
IPv6 connections.
So unless you already know that the host itself is down, why would you avoid
trying the other routes you have to it?

Look at it another way: when trying to reach host X, you discover that X has two
IP addresses, A and B. You try to reach A and it's not available. Isn't it
better to try B instead, rather than to avoid trying B at all just because A was
unreachable?

In a pool scenario, you might want to try to cluster addresses together by
perceived identity so that you can try an entirely different host first, rather
than a different address for the same host who happens to be in the pool twice.
But that strikes me as a very narrow optimization, certainly something that'd
only be worth implementing after we've squeezed the last bit of performance out
of other parts of the code (parallel connections, "happy eyeballs", etc).
Definitely not something to bother with at the outset. So i'd say drop that
optimization for simplicity's sake.

So the simplest approach is:

a) know the configured name of the keysserver
b) resolve it to a set of addresses
c) try to connect to those addresses, using the configured name of the server
for SNI and HTTP Host:

This is all that's needed for cases (1) and (3), and it could also be used in
case (2) if you see (b) as a two-stage resolution process (name→SRV→A/AAAA),
discarding the intermediate names from the SRV. Given that some people may
access the pool via case (1), and servers in the pool won't be able to
distinguish between how they were selected (SRV vs. A/AAAA), they'll still
accept the connections.

If you decide the additional complexity is worthwhile for tracking the
intermediate names in the SRV records, you can always propagate the intermediate
names wherever you like locally without changing the "simplest" algorithm.

If you really want to use the names from the SRV in collecting, then the
algorithm should change to:

a) know the configured name of the keyserver
b) resolve it to a set of intermediate names
c) resolve the intermediate names to a set of addresses
d) try to connect to those addresses, using the intermediate name of the server
for SNI and HTTP host.

But still, no PTR records are needed.

Here's a concrete example of how using PTR records gets things mixed up.

keyserver.stack.nl offers keyserver service on port 443.

It has an A record at 131.155.141.70.

But the ptr is to mud.stack.nl:

70.141.155.131.in-addr.arpa. 69674 IN PTR mud.stack.nl.

and the https SNI and HTTP Host: directives provide an entirely different
website depending on whether you access it with:

  https://mud.stack.nl/

or

  https://keyserver.stack.nl/

If you access it as https://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net/, you get the
"keyserver" view. But if you access it by the name in the PTR record
("mud.stack.nl") then you get the mud view (and a 404 on any /pks URLs)

Even more troubling is that dirmngr successfully connects to mud.stack.nl and
does the query, even though it is configured to only talk to
hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net

This suggests that anyone able to spoof a PTR record to me can get my dirmngr to
send my potentially-sensitive keyserver queries to an entirely different webserver.

I've moved the discussion about the need for PTR over to
T2928

In this ticket, let's focus on what happens when Tor has the NoIPv6Traffic flag
set. How should dirmngr respond in that case?

I think if it gets a "permission denied" from its tor socket (or from any proxy)
when it's trying to connect to a host, it should treat that host as dead and
move to try next one. If dirmngr knows that it is using tor, and it knows that
the address it is trying is also IPv6, it could also log a message about the
IPv6Traffic flag.

does that seem like the right set of changes needed?

if you add NoIPv6Traffic to your torrc, and restart tor, can you replicate the
problem?

here's the example run from my modified reproducer script that focuses on
oteiza.siccegge.de:

gpg: keybox '/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.XgzSpI4Oy0/gpg/pubring.kbx' created
gpg: keyserver receive failed: Permission denied
S # hosttable (idx, ipv6, ipv4, dead, name, time):
S # 0 6 oteiza.siccegge.de v6=[2a01:4a0:59:1000:223:9eff:fe00:100f]
OK
2017-01-18 03:19:00 dirmngr[30881] listening on socket
'/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.XgzSpI4Oy0/gpg/S.dirmngr'
2017-01-18 03:19:00 dirmngr[30882.0] permanently loaded certificates: 0
2017-01-18 03:19:00 dirmngr[30882.0] runtime cached certificates: 0
2017-01-18 03:19:00 dirmngr[30882.0] failed to open cache dir file
'/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.XgzSpI4Oy0/gpg/crls.d/DIR.txt': No such file or directory
2017-01-18 03:19:00 dirmngr[30882.0] creating directory
'/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.XgzSpI4Oy0/gpg/crls.d'
2017-01-18 03:19:00 dirmngr[30882.0] new cache dir file
'/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.XgzSpI4Oy0/gpg/crls.d/DIR.txt' created
2017-01-18 03:19:01 dirmngr[30882.6] handler for fd 6 started
2017-01-18 03:19:01 dirmngr[30882.6] connection from process 30879 (1000:1000)
2017-01-18 03:19:01 dirmngr[30882.6] DBG: dns: libdns initialized (tor mode)
2017-01-18 03:19:02 dirmngr[30882.6] DBG: dns:
getsrv(_pgpkey-http._tcp.oteiza.siccegge.de) -> 0 records
2017-01-18 03:19:02 dirmngr[30882.6] DBG: dns: libdns initialized (tor mode)
2017-01-18 03:19:03 dirmngr[30882.6] DBG: dns:
resolve_dns_name(oteiza.siccegge.de): Success
2017-01-18 03:19:03 dirmngr[30882.6] resolve_dns_addr for 'oteiza.siccegge.de':
'oteiza.siccegge.de' [already known]
2017-01-18 03:19:03 dirmngr[30882.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 03:19:03 dirmngr[30882.6] number of system provided CAs: 142
2017-01-18 03:19:03 dirmngr[30882.6] DBG: http.c:connect_server: trying
name='oteiza.siccegge.de' port=11371
2017-01-18 03:19:05 dirmngr[30882.6] DBG: dns:
resolve_dns_name(oteiza.siccegge.de): Success
2017-01-18 03:19:05 dirmngr[30882.6] can't connect to 'oteiza.siccegge.de':
Permission denied
2017-01-18 03:19:05 dirmngr[30882.6] error connecting to
'http://oteiza.siccegge.de:11371': Permission denied
2017-01-18 03:19:05 dirmngr[30882.6] command 'KS_GET' failed: Permission denied
2017-01-18 03:19:05 dirmngr[30882.6] handler for fd 6 terminated
2017-01-18 03:19:05 dirmngr[30882.6] handler for fd 6 started
2017-01-18 03:19:05 dirmngr[30882.6] connection from process 30921 (1000:1000)
2017-01-18 03:19:05 dirmngr[30882.6] handler for fd 6 terminated

fwiw, i'm seeing fewer errors with this version than i was before, perhaps
because we're addressing servers via tor by name instead of by IP address, which
means that we're not tickling the IPv6 issue quite as often?

The failure with oteiza.siccegge.de might actually just be the IPv6 issue
itself, since there is no IPv4 address for it. I can actually force the issue
if i just add the following line to the dirmngr.conf generated in my reproducer
script:

    keyserver hkp://oteiza.siccegge.de

but of course it's a faster failure, because there isn't a dozen DNS A->PTR
round-trips.

Can you explain why dirmngr does the DNS roundtrip lookup, mapping from the
pool's A and AAAA addresses back to names? It seems like it'd be a lot simpler
(and faster, and less error-prone) to avoid the PTR lookups if we have the IP
addresses already.

I note here that the "oteiza.siccegge.de" domain name might be supplied by PTR
records for both its v4 and v6 addresses, and it appears to have a AAAA record,
but it doesn't have any *forward* A record.

I'm baffled by the fact that you're not seeing these errors, and not sure what
to do about it. What version of tor are you running? how is it configured?

i'm running the stock debian tor package, version 0.2.9.8-2.

I've tried with the latest patches and i still see failures :(

gpg: keybox '/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.nchsng7MNY/gpg/pubring.kbx' created
gpg: keyserver receive failed: Permission denied
S # hosttable (idx, ipv6, ipv4, dead, name, time):
S # 0 hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
S # . hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
S # . --> 9 11 6 4 10 5 7 8 2* 3 1
S # 1 6 4 sks.spodhuis.org v6=[2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:73:6b73] v4=94.142.242.225
S # 2 6 4 oteiza.siccegge.de v6=[2a01:4a0:59:1000:223:9eff:fe00:100f]
v4=92.43.111.21
S # 3 6 prod00.keyserver.dca.witopia.net v6=[2606:9500:201:1::141]
S # 4 6 4 gpg.NebrWesleyan.edu v6=[2606:1c00:2802::b] v4=192.94.109.73
S # 5 6 4 d hufu.ki.iif.hu v6=[2001:738:0:600:216:3eff:fe02:42]
v4=193.224.163.43 (1s)
S # 6 6 4 gozer.rediris.es v6=[2001:720:418:caf1::8] v4=130.206.1.8
S # 7 4 ip-209-135-211-141.ragingwire.net v4=209.135.211.141
S # 8 4 mud.stack.nl v4=131.155.141.70
S # 9 4 ams.sks.heypete.com v4=51.15.53.138
S # 10 4 host-37-191-238-78.lynet.no v4=37.191.238.78
S # 11 4 cryptonomicon.mit.edu v4=18.9.60.141
OK
2017-01-18 02:56:23 dirmngr[9098] listening on socket
'/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.nchsng7MNY/gpg/S.dirmngr'
2017-01-18 02:56:23 dirmngr[9099.0] permanently loaded certificates: 0
2017-01-18 02:56:23 dirmngr[9099.0] runtime cached certificates: 0
2017-01-18 02:56:23 dirmngr[9099.0] failed to open cache dir file
'/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.nchsng7MNY/gpg/crls.d/DIR.txt': No such file or directory
2017-01-18 02:56:23 dirmngr[9099.0] creating directory
'/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.nchsng7MNY/gpg/crls.d'
2017-01-18 02:56:23 dirmngr[9099.0] new cache dir file
'/home/dkg/tmp/tmp.nchsng7MNY/gpg/crls.d/DIR.txt' created
2017-01-18 02:56:24 dirmngr[9099.6] handler for fd 6 started
2017-01-18 02:56:24 dirmngr[9099.6] connection from process 9096 (1000:1000)
2017-01-18 02:56:24 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: libdns initialized (tor mode)
2017-01-18 02:56:25 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns:
getsrv(_pgpkey-https._tcp.hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net) -> 0 records
2017-01-18 02:56:25 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: libdns initialized (tor mode)
2017-01-18 02:56:27 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns:
resolve_dns_name(hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:28 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:28 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'sks.spodhuis.org'
2017-01-18 02:56:28 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:29 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:29 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'oteiza.siccegge.de'
2017-01-18 02:56:29 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:29 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:29 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'prod00.keyserver.dca.witopia.net'
2017-01-18 02:56:29 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:30 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:30 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'gpg.NebrWesleyan.edu'
2017-01-18 02:56:30 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:31 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): No name
2017-01-18 02:56:31 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr failed while checking
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': No name
2017-01-18 02:56:32 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:32 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'hufu.ki.iif.hu'
2017-01-18 02:56:32 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:33 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:33 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'gozer.rediris.es'
2017-01-18 02:56:33 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:34 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Connection
closed in DNS
2017-01-18 02:56:34 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr failed while checking
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': Connection closed in DNS
2017-01-18 02:56:35 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:35 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'ip-209-135-211-141.ragingwire.net'
2017-01-18 02:56:35 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:36 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:36 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'hufu.ki.iif.hu' [already known]
2017-01-18 02:56:36 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:37 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:37 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'gpg.NebrWesleyan.edu' [already known]
2017-01-18 02:56:37 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:38 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:38 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'mud.stack.nl'
2017-01-18 02:56:38 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:38 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:38 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'gozer.rediris.es' [already known]
2017-01-18 02:56:38 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:39 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:39 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'sks.spodhuis.org' [already known]
2017-01-18 02:56:39 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:40 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:40 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'oteiza.siccegge.de' [already known]
2017-01-18 02:56:40 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:41 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:41 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'ams.sks.heypete.com'
2017-01-18 02:56:41 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:41 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:41 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'host-37-191-238-78.lynet.no'
2017-01-18 02:56:41 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:42 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:42 dirmngr[9099.6] resolve_dns_addr for
'hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net': 'cryptonomicon.mit.edu'
2017-01-18 02:56:42 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_addr(): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:42 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: http.c:connect_server: trying
name='hufu.ki.iif.hu' port=443
2017-01-18 02:56:45 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns: resolve_dns_name(hufu.ki.iif.hu):
Connection closed in DNS
2017-01-18 02:56:45 dirmngr[9099.6] resolving 'hufu.ki.iif.hu' failed:
Connection closed in DNS
2017-01-18 02:56:45 dirmngr[9099.6] can't connect to 'hufu.ki.iif.hu': host not
found
2017-01-18 02:56:45 dirmngr[9099.6] error connecting to
'https://hufu.ki.iif.hu:443': Unknown host
2017-01-18 02:56:45 dirmngr[9099.6] marking host 'hufu.ki.iif.hu' as dead
2017-01-18 02:56:45 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: http.c:connect_server: trying
name='oteiza.siccegge.de' port=443
2017-01-18 02:56:46 dirmngr[9099.6] DBG: dns:
resolve_dns_name(oteiza.siccegge.de): Success
2017-01-18 02:56:46 dirmngr[9099.6] can't connect to 'oteiza.siccegge.de':
Permission denied
2017-01-18 02:56:46 dirmngr[9099.6] error connecting to
'https://oteiza.siccegge.de:443': Permission denied
2017-01-18 02:56:46 dirmngr[9099.6] command 'KS_GET' failed: Permission denied
2017-01-18 02:56:46 dirmngr[9099.6] handler for fd 6 terminated
2017-01-18 02:56:46 dirmngr[9099.6] handler for fd 6 started
2017-01-18 02:56:46 dirmngr[9099.6] connection from process 9101 (1000:1000)
2017-01-18 02:56:46 dirmngr[9099.6] handler for fd 6 terminated