- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Today
Please briefly try to reproduce on Windows with Gpg4win 5.0.2. At lot has changed since this ticket was created so that it might be fixed already.
I cannot reproduce the empty dialog on Linux with the current build. I always see a correct result dialog for the readable file.
We use individual texts now that all follow the pattern "Detailed results of import from ..." for import from file (file name is displayed), clipboard, notepad, smart card, WKD (URL is displayed), server ("keyserver" or "LDAP server").
Note: This isn't included in Gpg4win 5.0(.2).
Note: This isn't included in Gpg4win 5.0(.2).
Note: This isn't included in Gpg4win 5.0(.2).
Note: This isn't included in Gpg4win 5.0(.2).
I stand partially corrected. Apparently, pinentry-efl also sets close_button. For Gpg4win that's irrelevant because we ship pinentry-qt (and pinentry-w32) which doesn't have this IMHO contra-intuitive behavior.
Upstream MR for reading system config files before user config files: https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfig/-/merge_requests/436
pinentry-tty and pinentry-curses support GPG_ERR_FULLY_CANCELED by Ctrl-C. But other pinentry implementations have no support (only GPG_ERR_CANCELED).
I'd also like to point out that changing the error code from GPG_ERR_CANCELED to GPG_ERR_FULLY_CANCELED could cause regressions in applications.
Merge request for KMessageBox: https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kwidgetsaddons/-/merge_requests/339
How do you want to decide whether to show two "Cancel" buttons? How would you call those two "Cancel" buttons? For decryption I can imagine that for example "Try Next Key" and "Cancel Decryption" (or even just "Cancel") would make clear what happens.
Yesterday
Any further improvements will have to go in a new ticket when we have a plan. I'll close this one.
ok, lets go with the message box.
Q1 stays like it is, for Q3 @tfry made a merge request to wrap after 120 characters. Please add a link to this.
Relevant part from T6793: Cleanup temporary files / dirs with decrypted content:
If this definition is OK
@bernhard Thank you for the link.
Tue, Mar 10
In T8076#215372, @werner wrote:If you specify a primary key the primary key shall be deleted. If there is only an offline or token based primary it can't be deleted. This is what the user requested. We can't change this because otherwise subkeys might be unintentionally deleted.
What is an "incomplete team key" - a standard offline secret key (i.e. one with only secret subkeys)?
It would be used for key creation just like the legacy options PGPKeyType and RSAKeySizes were used (and still can be used but only for RSA with different key sizes).
If you specify a primary key the primary key shall be deleted. If there is only an offline or token based primary it can't be deleted. This is what the user requested. We can't change this because otherwise subkeys might be unintentionally deleted.
I guess the behavior changed with gpg 2.4, i.e. "With gpg 2.4 (or later), ..."