I am not sure that I am clear on what you are asking. I am not an expert on cri-o, but is does seem that there are multiple processes (threads), which all call gpgme_op_verify There are also calls to gpgme_op_import

@sj98ta Please let us know if cri-o invokes other processes (except the ones by gpgme) or not.
If cri-o invokes other processes (by other threads), my theory matters; With the interference by other processes holding pipe file descriptors, gpgme keeps polling pipe file descriptors.

Pushed the change: rG16ee68259d1d: gpg,regexp: Use -DREGEXP_PREFIX=gnupg_.

I have now seen instances where 1, 2, or 3 processes hang.

We do this now also for gpg-wks-server. Further gpg-wks-client now sends the current language to the server so that the server can get back to the user with a proper translated text (if configured).

Yes, for GPD and VSD there probably should be version numbers in swdb.lst if the update check should actually be active in those distributions. I think for VSD the update check is usually deactivated because a) it accesses the public internet which some customers don't want and b) the software is usually not installed by the users themselves so that the update check doesn't make much sense.

So, what shall we do with vanilla kleopatra, or GPD or VSD? It will be easy to record current versions number in swdb.lst

Alright. We use utf-8 in our template files and switch to QP encoding when needed.

Tagging with Windows because the update check is a NOP except on Windows.

In T7656#201529, @ikloecker wrote:

In T7656#201519, @TobiasFella wrote:

Do I understand correctly that this bug is then automatically done/fixed?

It depends on how the version comparison works. We may have to change the code to extract the version number (e.g. 5.0.0) from the version string.