Hello ...
It is not really helpful if you publish that fact anyway on a public tracker.
Hello ...
It is not really helpful if you publish that fact anyway on a public tracker.
Follow-up in reference:
https://dev.gnupg.org/T6258
Please note that gpg4win 3.1 is not anymore maintained.
"Fix IMAP access to encrypted mails" - patch still not applied in codebase 3.1.25 ...
I did a build of Gpg4Win 3.1.24 with Andre's provided patch :-)
If you could try: https://files.gpg4win.org/Beta/gpgol/2.5.5-beta2/x64/ (Source tarball in the directory above, signed by my key)
If you could enable data debugging though (Include Data) in a log. And send it to me
Here is another Test:
Should i create a new log without "include data" ?
If we would provide Gpg4win-3.1.24 also in binary form we would make it harder for us to argue that VS-NfD users have to purchase GnuPG VS-Desktop with the required support
What i don't understand is ...
Hello,
thanx for fixing this issue ...
Hello, i did some debugging with my local sks keyserver version 1.1.6+ on Debian:
Just to clarify: Does this only happen with self-built AppImages? Or does this also happen with AppImages provided by gnupg.com/gnupg.org?
Hello ...
I may report, that I've tested this behaviour with "kleopatra" with serveral keyservers.
In T5783#153879, @werner wrote:Sending a private key with just the local protection is not a good idea.
In T5784#153872, @werner wrote:Please no holy wars on the type of curves. NIST as its opinon, Europe has its opinion, DJB has of course a different opinion. Please use the the cryptography ML for such political/technical discussions.