a GUI for GNU PG among other things
Details
Today
Yesterday
"Exclusive user" sounds a bit odd and could still be misinterpreted. A native speaker would probably say "Are you the sole user of this secret key?“ or (even better and shorter) "Are you the only user of this secret key?"
Fri, Feb 14
Background of my "reminder" comment: we were discussing to establish a sane workflow for sharing keys. Which is quite commonly done e.g. for functional mail addresses, but usually people seem to share the whole secret key which is not advisable. We would want people to only share subkeys for that purpose.
It was the case that somebody gets a subkey for such an "offline" primary for the first time, which I was thinking of.
Details should be the first action (since it's likely the most often used action by people who don't know about double-click). And I'd move the "destructive actions" to the bottom. And there are way to many separators.
Reminder: we have to keep in mind the workflow of the import of secret subkeys. Do we need different behavior conditional on "is primary key present" or not?
With my initial suggestions, modified by:
Thu, Feb 13
Another thing (should definitely go into a new ticket if we want to do something regarding this):
Again for Gpg4win 4.4.0, this time with better attention (and definitively encryption only):
Wed, Feb 12
Shorter version:
Possible explanation text for the user regarding the background of the question (probably to long):
Tue, Feb 11
This is the current (VSD 3.3.0) state for Japanese (with German as fallback):
Everything mentioned above was translated and is now shown that way in all three languages.
I would keep the "create group", too.
Regarding the suggest list I would change the following:
Thu, Feb 6
Fixed.
I'd suggest removing:
Wed, Feb 5
If a single OpenPGP certificate is updated then we now show the same detailed information for the update from WKD as for the update from a keyserver, i.e. if the certificate didn't change via WKD then we say so.
I think there's some confusion.