Currently have 8 block parallel implementation done. Need to check if 6 block parallel approach is better (as used in OpenSSL - benefit being less register pressure and less moving of data between registers and stack).

Thanks for reporting this. You are correct, those HWCAP2_SHA1 and HWCAP2_SHA2 defines are wrong.

Translation of "key" is difficult in our context of public key cryptography.
In many case "key" just refers public key, but for key generation, it means key pair.

Granted I'm not familiar with the functions and it may not be applicable, but the DNS resolver functions in the GNU C Library have semi-recently gained parameters (RES_USE_DNSSEC) to check for DNSSEC validation IIRC. Recent versions of glibc also don't trust the 'ad' bit unless an indication of its trustworthiness is set in /etc/resolv.conf, say if using a local validating resolver, so one can be sure that it's trustworthy. It also appears musl libc may support this.

Thanks, appreciated.

You are lucky. The report came just in time for the 2.2.26 released. Not mentioned over thre but anyway fixed. See T5153

See T5192 for an updated release.

This is x86_64 (amd64) Fedora Linux version 32 (nothing to do with the x32 sorta-architecture).

Oh well, sshfs.

Just for reference what OS and file system is this? It looks like some x32 Linux.

also update doc/help.zh_TW.txt by the way
D515: update gnupg doc/help.zh_TW.txt

Yes, that worked. Thanks for the tip and sorry for the noise ;-)

upload the v2 patch and create a revision
D514: update gnupg doc/help.zh_CN.txt
waiting for review
:-)

GnuPG uses the systems locale.

Please not that you can use this interface: https://dev.gnupg.org/differential/
I think that it is better when you update your patch. You can just refer a patch from this task by:

In T5189#140362, @gniibe wrote:

Do you call gpg-agent as 'Gpg 代理'? IIUC, it is better keep it as is (gpg-agent), because it is the name of the program.

If translated, 'keygrip' should be different word to 'fingerprint', because 'fingerprint' is used as a technical term of OpenPGP.

Do you call gpg-agent as 'Gpg 代理'? IIUC, it is better keep it as is (gpg-agent), because it is the name of the program.

I think that ... For some reason, your private key file under .gnupg/private-keys-v1.d has wrong serial number.

Thank you for your testing.
May I ask more test, please?

OS, Compiler, any configure options?

In a discussion we decided that we need a deadline for GnuPG 2.3.0 so that we finally release it.

Hi, I have applied both patch and appears Yubikey is now working correct. I have uploaded the log here.