This can be tested with Kleopatra by configuring an invalid keyserver and then updating an OpenPGP certificate.

Instead of "The key hasn't changed." Kleopatra now displays "The update was skipped because no keyserver is configured."

It could have been discussed whether this makes sense. However, we can't change it anymore because it would change the behaviour. Consider a cron job which looks into a directory with keyids and imports them from a keyserver. It is totally fine if the script returns success if no keys are available.

In T6761#183780, @ebo wrote:

But in the case "Refresh OpenPGP keys" (in Kleopatras certificate Details) there is no error message but instead ~"the key is unchanged".

Your above excerpt for the log is not a bounce. Can you please give me an example from a rejected bounce? Noet that BATV is also in use.

There is no way to recover it?

The mail server is misconfigured. no SPF <> not allowed.

That is on purpose. Please add an SPF record to your site. If there is really really a problem for you with that, write me off tracker.

See T7034

Sorry, this is not a help line but a bug tracker. If you lost or forgot your password you are screwed up.

I have also not found a straightforward way to correct a cross-signature that was made with a weak digest algorithm using GnuPG.

I still need to land the fix for the kwallet problem, but that can be done first thing monday so nothing that really blocks a release

with Version 3.2.2.231170+git~ (Gpg4win-4.3.1-beta12):

• no error message any more with keyserver = none
• correct error message when choosing "publish on server"

But in the case "Refresh OpenPGP keys" (in Kleopatras certificate Details) there is no error message but instead ~"the key is unchanged".

Version 3.2.2.231170+git~ (Gpg4win-4.3.1-beta12): works, when entering a mail address the search result is presented very fast now. When entering only a name, nothing happens. So functionality is there, the improvement in UX is T6493.

I had a look at the open tasks for pinentry(-qt) and didn't see anything that we should address before doing a release. @werner?

I should say: I can ship a snapshot in Gentoo if that's okay, but I'd prefer not to.