Full ack.

Seems we can close this bug.

We have not seen this problem anymore in recent versions. Thus closing.

We have a solulion for this bug. For further improvements we will use T5882.

• Fixed in 2.3
• assert replaced by a fatal error message

Printing a note as we do in --edit-key is a good idea.

Passing fds etc adds complex extra code to gpg-agent. This was not the original design goal, although we violated this anyway by have some OpenPGP specific code there. This needs more thinking. Due to our internal use of OCB we can't make it FIPS compliant without large changes.

I have not yet tested OpenSSH 9 and thus the patch to master is here just as a test. Please better use gnupg 2.3 (stable) instead of 2.2 (LTS) because it is unlikely that we will backport all this new ssh stuff.

We once figured that we should use this for gpgme, where we use a helper to close handles. We have not yet found the time to do this and frankly "never change a running system" ;-) We also still support Windows XP SP3 with GnuPG for users with air-gaped machines. Not sure whether this is still justified, though.

The reason for this is probably that we expect that several UIDs are added and running a check-trustdb for eachleads to some extra waiting time.

Updated the copy on our mirror as welll as the gpg4win and swdb packages files.

The set_bit is obvious but we should cross check with the specs. In the non-fips mode we also try w/o a limit.

The fix is from 2018 but was not picked up widely; see
https://github.com/madler/zlib/commit/5c44459c3b28a9bd3283aaceab7c615f8020c531

Sorry, that was a misunderstanding. My fault.

In fact, decent 2.2 versions (>=2.2.21) have the ability to decrypt AEAD packets - this has been implemented exactly for the case that some things get wrong at the user site. But we can't change old versions - we are not the Sirius Computer Corporation. I close this ticket because we can can't do anything if you are not able/willing to update to the latest version of the respective branch. Sorry.

There is also the very simple pinentry-tty

I don't like it either but the browser vendors don't like SRV records.

I still think that redirecting to another catch-all domain is contrary to the original goal and weakens the security model. We need to see what we can do about this.

Not in the way it is used by gpg. See T5880

The ECDHE_ECDSA suites are not yet implemented in ntbtls and thus we can't agree on a common cipher suite. Will be solved in the next Windows version.

Are you using 2.3.4 also on Windows?

see rC67b36154f88e for master.

Will add it. The reason I added Brainpool was due to a question on the performacne between Brainpool and other NIST.