- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Oct 25 2023
Would love to test this, but I can't seem to compile this project, getting stuck at The system does not provide a working iconv function. Is there a Fedora based dockerfile or equivalent where I could build it? Here is the reference Fedora source. I have tried to hack it and build from a gitarchive, but I am still encountering issues No rule to make target 'audit-events.h', needed by 'all'. Stop.
This is finally done.
Only compliant algorithms are offered when (re)generating single keys or all keys. In de-vs mode, Brainpool 256 is preselected if the smart card supports it. Otherwise, RSA 3072 is preselected.
You are right, this is a new feature that could be useful but is now in high demand and not a bug so Wishlist is more appropiate.
Oct 24 2023
While trying to replicate your findings I might have found a but in the import code which rejected one of the keys (using gnupg 2.2). I'll take care of this.
According to our rules an initial set of tags should never be a milestone but be in the Backlog or, if work already started,in the WiP column. Because it is anyway invalid, I removed the tags.
T6536 has been fixed. With today's commits the Brainpool curves are now also flagged as compliant in gpgsm.
Now fixed in 2.2 and 2.4 (commits rG08f0b9ea2e955209d467f1ff624bf7abd10ae7ac and rG7661d2fbc6eb533016df63a86ec3e35bf00cfb1f). See also T6752
In T6637#177217, @jukivili wrote:Yes, int8_t/int16_t/int32_t/uint8_t/uint16_t/uint32_t should not be used. There is size-specific integer types defined in src/types.h which can be used instead (byte/u16/u32). This header does not yet have signed integer types, but those can be added (for example, s8/s16/s32).
Oct 23 2023
For the export of multiple certificates (i.e. not group export), this task is blocked by the wishlist issue T5847: Kleopatra: New Feature for bulk certify. Either this issue is also wishlist or the other issue is needs to become normal.
IMO for LDAP we should not warn at all. Because there it is possible to remove certificates.
In T6637#176910, @fse wrote:OK, fine, however, in order to be able keep an overview of our tasks I would still keep track of them in our GitHub, where I can create a sub-issue from the list of tasks with one click. But we will post our comments and results here as well as far relevant for the purpose of documentation. I think most of the points Jussi raised are more or less clear to me anyway.
Yes, int8_t/int16_t/int32_t/uint8_t/uint16_t/uint32_t should not be used. There is size-specific integer types defined in src/types.h which can be used instead (byte/u16/u32). This header does not yet have signed integer types, but those can be added (for example, s8/s16/s32).
I opened T6771 for this because this issue is done.
In T6766#177137, @ikloecker wrote:I haven't added the possibility to start a group certification directly from the confirmation message.
In T6767#177126, @werner wrote:Should we have a gpg_error_from_w32() as companion to gpg_error_from_syserror() ?