Oh yes, the usual import statistics should be shown here.

Pushed the change, although it is not enabled yet (since the feature will be only available by newer libgcrypt, 1.11).

Pushed.

Pushed to master.

is there any news for gnupgp 4.0.4 release with gnupg 2.3.8?

In T5790#163980, @manonfgoo wrote:

@margirou:

Can you test the Patch, does it work for you ?

Kind regards,
Manon

In T5790#163886, @werner wrote:

[Merging didn't work]

Can you test the Patch, does it work for you ?

Here is the patch as file:

The patch applies with -p1 to the master brach, alternatively I could push a commit, but my user does not seam to be allowed to do so:

[Merging didn't work]

Attached you find a patch to this issue. This Patch sets the "keypair" attribute to the keys 0x82 to 0x95 unconditionaly.

In T6218#163787, @gouttegd wrote:

Does the latest Scute require an instance of gpg-agent and/or scdaemon running to work?

Yes. Scute relies on those to interact with the token.

Does the latest Scute require an instance of gpg-agent and/or scdaemon running to work?

Applied and pushed the change from @joeyberkovitz in rG3257385378bb: dirmngr: Interrogate LDAP server when base DN specified..

That sounds quite cool.

Actually we developed PIV support to allow the use of PIV X.509 certificates and OpenPGP keys with Yubikeys. In fact, GnuPG is able to switch between the Yubikey PIV and OpenPGP applications on-the-fly while keeping their PIN verification states.

I was indeed using version 1.5.0 for testing, but I wish to clarify the purpose of Scute in my setup before proceeding.

Which version of Scute are you using?

Using Scute as a drop-in replacement doesn't currently work. Perhaps my config needs more adjustments than just:

module = /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/scute/scute.so

Yes, I meant to use Scute as pkcsc11 module for pam_pkcs11. Thanks for explaining more verbosely what I meant.

I think Werner may have confused pam_pkcs11 with gnupg-pkcs11-scd. :)

I'm not sure what you mean with using Scute as PKCS#11 provider instead of pam_pkcs11, as pam_pkcs11 is not a provider but a user of PKCS#11

BTW, I have also in mind to use an AD entry to figure out the used keyserver. It turned out that people don't like to modify the schema of their AD but instead use a separate LDS.

To proceed, I pushed an initial part as rG993820c31521: dirmngr: Factor out interrogate_ldap_dn function., which doesn't change any behavior.
Then, the point of the change will be clearer.

There is a reason why pcsc-shared is not the default ;-). Please try using Scute (best the t6002 branch until it has been merged) as pkcs#11 provider instead of pam_pkcs11. And you should of course use the stable version of GnuPG and not the LTS (2.2).

This still did not seem to help me in making the tests working on Fedora with git master. I am still getting wrong paths to the gpgconf

gpgscm: error running '/root/gnupg/tests/tools/gpgconf': probably not installed

There is a full reproducer and more complete log in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089075#c11

We want to get rid of sshcontrol but we could keep it as an optional configuration to sort keys. I won't say it is a bug, though.

just checking in about getting this patch reviewed

I hacked configure.ac of gnupg to force it build with libgpg-error 1.45, and OpenSSH works with the created pipe. Maybe the libgpg-error fix is only necessary in some certain circumstances?

Awesome, thanks all! From an end user perspective that would be a perfectly acceptable outcome, the warning just serves to confuse people. Appreciate the help!

I have created the spin-off T6202: Kleopatra: Suppress errors of WKD lookups to deal with not bothering Kleopatra's users with error messages when doing a WKD lookup in the background. This task is for improving dirmngr.

I see what I can do

Real Passphrase is "test"

In T6014#163086, @ikloecker wrote:

In T6014#163083, @aheinecke wrote:

I think it is problematic that the WKD errors are shown to the user at all. Doing some random searches gives an error each time something can't be accessed.

Can you give an example other than the Syntax error issue? So far, I haven't seen any errors when doing random searches with ASCII-only "email addresses". I simply get zero results, but I don't see error messages, e.g. if the host cannot be found.

Here is a list of possible issues:

It's not yet pushed, because it requires new release of libgpg-error (for T6112: libgpg-error,w32: bidirectional Pipe support for estream).

I was looking for this when writing the update NEWS for the latest release and noticed that this has not been pushed yet. I really think that it would be nice to have that. Especially for Smartcard use cases.

Should be OK for mingw.org's MinGW. I cannot test the MinGW64 bits, but I trust that you did.

I encountered this issue of struct stat when compiling for x86_64 of Windows.
I'm considering this patch:

diff --git a/common/sysutils.c b/common/sysutils.c
index c30f9a0ce..bbed309a8 100644
--- a/common/sysutils.c
+++ b/common/sysutils.c
@@ -1237,10 +1237,20 @@ int
 gnupg_stat (const char *name, struct stat *statbuf)
 {
 # ifdef HAVE_W32_SYSTEM
+#  if __MINGW32_MAJOR_VERSION > 3
+    /* mingw.org's MinGW */
+#   define STRUCT_STAT _stat
+#  elif defined(_USE_32BIT_TIME_T)
+    /* MinGW64 for i686 */
+#   define STRUCT_STAT _stat32
+#  else
+    /* MinGW64 for x86_64 */
+#   define STRUCT_STAT _stat64i32
+#  endif
   if (any8bitchar (name))
     {
       wchar_t *wname;
-      struct _stat32 st32;
+      struct STRUCT_STAT st32;
       int ret;

Thank you for reporting, and sorry for late handling of this report.

This looks like a different but not too uncommon problem. For T6169 we need to get a PKCS#12 file to be able to replicate the problems - obviously that PKCS#12 should hold only test keys/certs.

Needs to be forward ported to master

The delays are due to /usr/sbin/laptop_mode from the laptop-mode-tools package.

Inserting as well as removal is detected on my machine always only after 25 seconds

I wrote a simple testusb.c if monitoring USB devices works:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <libusb.h>
#include <poll.h>
#include <stdio.h>

exact v.2.3.8 is expected, generally I don't import Key on yubico I generate them directly from yubico itself in order to have the private Key created directly on yubico and not exportable.

Hi! I would like to add my experience about this issue.

what's new for a possible gnupg 2.3.8 or gpg4win 4.0.4 release?

Probably, PIPE_REJECT_REMOTE_CLIENTS mode and lpSecurityAttributes=NULL is OK.

Yes, that patch is not a great solution. Ideally there would be an interactive choice in the gpg CLI between encrypting/signing subkey during the add-existing-subkey operation.

This patch breaks adding existing ECDH encryption subkeys to a key because now gpg tries to treat the encryption subkey as signing subkey. This can be reproduced with test t-addexistingsubkey in gpgme.

I am adding the gpgcom tag as this causes support problems because we do not really know if it is an invalid object with the correct passphrase or if just the passphrase is incorrect.

@gniibe Perfect, I got the update during the night actually. Thanks a lot for your work 🙏 .

For the firmware 5.4.3, I confirmed that it works well with the changes:
https://dev.gnupg.org/T6070#160150

Hi lovely people,

I have exactly this problem with yubikey here,
since i upgraded to gpg4win version 4.0.3 which contains gnupg 2.3.7 i get the same error as openpgp key not recognized.

@tigernero 2.3.8 is not yet released. Pretty sure gpg4win is a separate project, presumably you'll see a changelog entry here (as there is bumping to 2.3.7 in the latest 4.0.3) when it's in:
https://www.gpg4win.org/change-history.html
https://www.gpg4win.org/support.html

I don't think that we need to fix things here. Important is that the WKD import uses a filter which imports only keys with the requested mail address. However, if a key with the same fingerprint already exists it will be merged.

The provided change does not look like fixing the problem for me. The path to gpgconf is still wrong and I am getting the same error both with master and with the patched tarballs:

make[2]: Entering directory '/home/jjelen/devel/gnupg/tests/tpm2dtests'
LC_ALL=C EXEEXT= PATH="../gpgscm:/home/jjelen/.local/bin:/home/jjelen/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin" abs_top_srcdir="/home/jjelen/devel/gnupg" objdir="/home/jjelen/devel/gnupg" TPMSERVER="" SWTPM="/bin/swtpm" SWTPM_IOCTL="/bin/swtpm_ioctl" GNUPG_BUILD_ROOT="/home/jjelen/devel/gnupg/tests" GPGSCM_PATH="/home/jjelen/devel/gnupg/tests/gpgscm" /home/jjelen/devel/gnupg/tests/gpgscm/gpgscm \
  /home/jjelen/devel/gnupg/tests/tpm2dtests/run-tests.scm  
gpgscm: error running '/home/jjelen/devel/gnupg/tests/tools/gpgconf': probably not installed
(wait-process "/home/jjelen/devel/gnupg/tests/tools/gpgconf" 2693795 #t): Configuration error

I can't find a url to download gnupg 2.3.8 for windows is it possible to know when gpg4win v.4.0.4 is out which fixes this bug? because currently on windows systems I am stuck using yubikey.

It is unlikely that the tofu stuff will get into widespread use in the 2.2 version - if at all.

As 2.3.7 was released on the 11th of July, see https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2022q3/000474.html
I guess that this issue should be closed and some issues moved to one with 2.3.8.