It is a matter of the used font. 2.2.29 will fix this problem.

The original idea with the DNS code was just to source copy it but it turned out that we need to maintain it in GnuPG. Thus adding support for SHA256 makes sense to keep the code current in case we ever need to use it.

wk at gnupg dot org but better avoid any HTML parts etc.

Thanks for the report.

Needs to be tested with the current 2.2 version and a gcry_log_debugsxp should be added to the error output.

This will not be fixed. Brainpool is a standard feature of Libgcrypt and thus this is a bug in the used Libgcrypt installation. Note that although I recently fixed a new regression test for this case, I do not think that it is a good idea to add extra code for a broken Libgcrypt.

This has been solved in 2.2.26 commit rGc75fd75532

That might depend on your pinentry version. With a pre-1.1.1 pinentry and 2.2.28 I get this:

Will be in 2.2.29.

Thanks. I added it to the list. If you have not yet done this I would suggest to write a note to gnupg-users.

We need to see how to best fix this regression test for all Python versions.

We should not support a different OID or representation of 22519 which will only lead to incompatibilities and trouble existing users. 25519 is in too widespread use than to allow for any changes.

FWIW: We have always refused to support shared mode because we anticipated such problems. However, we have a customer using their own cards along with card maintenance software of them. For their purposes PCSC_SHARED works just fine makes and this is why I decided to add --pcsc-shared along with a warning that it is in general not a good idea.

Was released with 1.14.0 see T4996

So let's close this task.

That looks all fine.

With the next release you will get only a warning:

gnupg-2.2/common/t-sexputil.c:467: test 0 failed: Unknown elliptic curve - ignored
This is likely due to a patched version of Libgcrypt with removed support for Brainpool curves

may give you some clues.

You are not using gpg4win with its included GnuPG 2.2 but some broken gpg version. The error message
"invalid size of lockfile" can only be emitted by the Unix version of GnuPG. Check for other installed gpg versions - there are sites which allows the download of for example a Cygwin version - these version can't work properly on Windows.