I've created the ticket above for Q2, we need to discuss how to follow up Q1 and Q3 next week.

We should also change the "donate" button to Gpg4win then and the text to "voluntary payment".

as T8022 was backported, this one should be backported, too, if possible. I'll add the tag

So this is all done, then. As for the open issue there is T7565: Kleopatra: Add tooltips in sign/encrypt window if an encryption type is greyed out

I guess those things need to be changed in Kleopatra after @gniibe made the changes in scd. I'll add a Kleo tag for discussion, as we should probably make several tickets from this.

Gpg4win-5.0.1 still shows case 1. (just reproduced.)

Ok, thanks. Closing the mail in Mailviewer will remove all temporary opened attachment files, so I'll set this to resolved.

Current state: T6793: Cleanup temporary files / dirs with decrypted content

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11.

• local conf after 2 saves (additional entry in local conf):
  
• local conf after 2 saves (additional entry in global conf):
  

Looks almost good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11.

I've made the above ticket for Q2. Regarding Q3 we leave it as is, if customers should complain we could then consider changing that.
Regarding Q1: we should talk about that next week. But I'll close this ticket.

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11.

Additionally, the action is no longer offered for keys with an encryption-capable secret primary key without secret encryption subkey.
And sharing the secret signing subkey isn't offered anymore if this is a card key.

There's something wrong. I suspect that gpgme is too old. Yeah, gpg4win 5 uses gpgme 2.0.1 and gpgmepp/gpgmeqt 2.0.0. The changes to force deletion was added later.

well, you are showing 4 pinentry-qt windows above. The reference to pinentry meant those windows.

In T7502#214891, @ebo wrote:

Q3: Would you make the text in "Certify shared secret key?" wrap?

In T7502#214891, @ebo wrote:

Q2: For 2 and 3 "Certify new certificate? You have imported an new certificate (public key) […]" is not strictly correct, this could be confusing. Maybe we could use the "Certify shared secret key?" instead and change it a bit to make it fit this case too? How about starting with:
"You have imported a shared secret key / a key without primary part." And then leave out the "shared" in the second sentence and in the window title.

In T7502#214891, @ebo wrote:

Q1: Does showing the "Detailed results of importing" make sense for the above cases? One could argue that we could remove it for all single imports where any dialog is shown.

For verification text improvements we have various other tickets, see T8095. I'll add this one as another of those.

@ikloecker said (paraphrased by me):

Curent state in gpg4win-5.0.2-beta-2 @ win11

• it asks for each subkey
• but no pinentry involved

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11:

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11 (no de-vs-compliance filter):

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11:

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11:

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11:

@ikloecker said (paraphrased by me):

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11.

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11:

The case above shows the case where the public key for the imported secret key was in the keyring beforehand.
We'll assume that this is something which would probably not occur in real life and don't explicitly handle this.

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11:

Fixed.

Looks good to me on gpg4win-5.0.2-beta2 @ win11:

All tables should now have a context menu which offers at least the Copy action (with "Copy cell contents to clipboard" as tool tip).