In Kleopatra an error window comes up in this case:

Kopieren des Schlüssels auf Karte fehlgeschlagen: 
Falsche PIN

There is still a buglet because in some modes the weak key error can be swallowed by other errors. A fix would be something like:

@jukivili Yes, please go ahead for both branches. Thank you.

I checked the upstream. For the reported issue, upstream version raises an error with REG_ERR_UNMATCHED_BRACKET.
That behavior is better (as we don't have particular reason to maintain different behavior from upstream version).
Also, I found another change from upstream for end of word check.

About error code. You need to use gcry_err_code(error_code) to get the GPG_ERR_WEAK_KEY value.

I wonder why github did not automatically closed this pull request - after all exact that patch was commited.

Commits & closes https://github.com/gpg/gnupg-doc/pull/2

Okay, that was easy to check.

Not easy to fix because gpg --card-edit/-status has some support form other cards. Eventually these commands will be replaced by gpg-card. In the meantime we can use this hack:

This can be a fixed validity period of the certifications. So like 3 years. Even if the user has set the certificate to be valid for only one year the user could then extend it in my opinion to the full 3 years before the certification loses the validity.

works, a key with a revoked uid is accepted as VS-NfD compliant, VS-Desktop-3.1.27.0-beta44

The generate keys etc. actions in the keys part of the view are debatable. At least for VSD I think they should not be shown or greyed out for not VS-NfD compliant cards -> see T6786
(I think there were even algorithms offered for generation on card which would result in an error, but I won't investigate further at the moment.)

I already commented in T5836 which should be discussed here, instead:

The options for key backup+delete, delete and keep all work now, tested with VS-Desktop-3.1.27.0-beta44

To test this you need to create an OpenPGP key without signing capability.

I will re-test it with KDE neon.

@dvratil I think the message has changed a bit with recent versions of the WKS server. Or is this maybe in a plugin that might not be installed on some distributions? At least when alexk tried it it was not processed on a fairly recent ArchLinux but he had such issues like plugin for crypto settings in KAdressbook not installed etc. so it might just be that. I can test this again but its probably best if we get you a test mail address with a forward for gnupg.org (which has WKS)

Because of the imported certificates tab I mention T6447 and T6183 for the certify question. Closing.