Thank you for the good report.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Dec 16 2019
Thanks for the report.
Thanks for the report but I cannot reproduce the issue :-/. In multipart alternative mails GpgOL takes the text part if text mode is set in Outlook.
[When changing a bug to a possible FAQ item it should be resolved and not marked as invalid]
All output of Assuan data lines is percent escaped. That is obvious because it is a line based format. You need to unescape it. Either use command line option
--decode
in-line command
/decode
or use
/datafile NAME
to write to a file.
Will be released with 3.1.11
This is done in 3.1.11
Fixed
Will be greatly improved with 3.1.11
We now have a decent error message for this.
Dec 14 2019
Dec 13 2019
Dec 12 2019
Although I don't use the ssh client on Windows I had to integrate the Windows ssh server into our release process (GlobalSign sent us a Windows-only token, for the new cert and so we can't anymore use osslsigncode). The ssh server is really stable and so it makes a lot of sense to better integrate our ssh-agent into Windows.
Dec 11 2019
Dec 10 2019
That sounds like you might have a different issue in mind?
Figuring out the matching user id for a new key signature. Right, --import-options repair-key is the the default and does the same. However, it was also the major cause for the recent trouble with the keyservers because it tried to verify all signatures. repair-keys was made the default (T2236) because it seemed to be nearly for free - which was a false assumption. We should not use this option by default and only consider properly placed signathures as valid. This of course also means that a userid is required.
Dec 9 2019
@werner, i don't understand your last remark. what "required computations" do you think the proposed patches are "moving" from the server to the client?
Oh, no worries! Just wanted to confirm, that's all.
I am about half way. Sorry for the slowness.
I've been wondering this also. I can start working on this.
Hello,
Is anyone working on this? Just want to confirm.
Dec 8 2019
I see no reason to move required computations from the server to the client.
@werner Could you please give an update on this? Is there any blocker? Is something missing, which prevents merging (and releasing) this?
Dec 7 2019
In T1287#94619, @werner wrote:2.1 has the option --unwrap to just this.