Thanks, I don't think that it is a problem for our usecase but the fix is trivial and we should apply it.

Thanks!

Thanks, will be fixed before the next release.

Thank you. I was waiting your feedback.

No, thks. It's just a test to confirm this rare behaviour. I did the same test several times with several and diferent results. But I think that a data corruption occurs sometimes when encripting a folder with several and large files. Just aconfirmation of the bug for the developpers.

Hi jmrexach,

I can confirm this has the desired effect for me on master (f97dc55ff1b041071bc3cbe98aa761bf77bb7ac8). Should we mark this issue as 'resolved' or do you have another process for that?

Hi, jmanuel, I agree with you.

I almost forget. If I zip the directory and the encypher the .zip file through Kleopatra, everything goes ok.

Have you used a very old version (< 3 ) to create the directory? I know you said that you are currently using Gpg4win-3.1.5 but maybe you have used an older version to create the archive.

The cyphered directory is a Windows 10 directory.

Have you used a very old version (< 3 ) to create the directory? I know you said that you are currently using Gpg4win-3.1.5 but maybe you have used an older version to create the archive.
In the past we had a problem that Kleopatra would not see the errors from the archive program but that was fixed some time ago. The Archive problem had problems with non ASCII filenames but nowadays it only has problems with full unicode filenames and those errors are shown in Kleopatra.

Thanks for the report. Fix will be in the next release.

I've developed a simple patch that sets the CREATE_BREAKAWAY_FROM_JOB flag when creating a new background process. This flag requires a special permission on the job object, which is tested first. This means that the patch only works if the parent process sets JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_BREAKAWAY_OK on the job object, otherwise the behavior should be as without the patch.

Hi,
we have a rare situation where the Home directory of Kleopatras backend ( gnupg ) becomes corrupted. This results in undefined behavior and strange error states from which we do not yet recover.

I don't think the cause of the corruptions is user interference. Users which report that don't even know about the GnuPG home directory in advance. I think we have some kind of rare bug which causes the keyring to break.

Hello, I'm trying to create my key with Cleopatra. It does not work.
At first it looks like it will work. The normal dialogue comes:
F576314: 1.jpg
The following when saving a backup, the following error occurs:
F576316: 2.jpg
When updating the certificates comes the following dialog:
F576319: 3.jpg
Enclosed the log files:
F576313: kleopatra.log.8456
F576312: Cleo-log
F576311: kleopatra.log.7084
Looking forward to help. Many Thanks

BTW, did you manually define -DNDEBUG, or what caused -DNDEBUG?

Reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_version_history, I guess that your kernel/glibc doesn't have working mlock.
It may work if running by root, though.

It is fixed in master branch of the repo.

OK, it's a libc with no pthread_rwlock_t.

T4298: 'make check' with uninstalled library, which is building now (even if rpath doesn't work well) handles related issue, which was fixed for libgcrypt-1.9. Since this issue is for other libraries (libgpg-error, specifically), we could do something similar, but, it may be detecting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to fail with "Please remove LD_LIBRARY_PATH".

I think Bash 5.0 is in sid, not testing yet. Are you sure it's related to Bash 5.0? Is there any possibility your upgrading some other software causing this?

Rebooting the system makes the issue disappear.

Since today, I cannot send any Signed email. Outlook is crashing.
I guess it is due to the new version of GpgOL I installed.

I've opened T4322 for the image embedding issue.

Thanks to the remediation.

I think I understand what is going on here:

@aheinecke the file is gpgolXXX.dat. I never got the winmail.dat (I think).

Thanks for taking care of the action.

@MThib What is the filename of the .dat with the original message, is it gpgolXXX.dat or winmail.dat and can you confirm that even without an attachment any modifications to the forwared mail are ignored and the mail is sent out as if it was send again?

There appears to be something very fishy when forwarding from the sent mails folder. Even without attachments if I forward and modify the content the original message is sent out and not the modified one.

Thanks for reply and clarification, regards danny

Thank you for the report. Sadly this is a long standing bug that is still not fixed. We hope to address this in a future version.

Thank you for your detailed report. I agree that this can have serious consequences as it might send out unintended information. I'll look into it with high priority.

Set to high because it breaks a build.

I sent a message to gnupg-devel about this issue as it will probably hit more people now that the keys used are expired :-(

Oh,.. it is even worse. The conflict keys expired 2019-01-06 so they are actually expired right now.

I don't know why @BenM closed this bug given that he mentioned that the qt part is yet not solved.

Should be looked at before the next release.

Hi,
thanks for the report. We were unaware of the Andorid problem. The Web App issue was already reported similary.

18:25:22/11956/ERROR/mapihelp.cpp:mapi_change_message_class: can't save old message class: hr=0x80070005
18:25:22/11956/mapihelp.cpp:mapi_create_attach_table: message has 2 attachments
18:25:22/11956/mapihelp.cpp:mapi_create_attach_table: attachment info:
18:25:22/11956/ 3435173 mt=0 fname=gpgol_string_7' ct=application/pgp-encrypted' ct_parms=`(null)'
18:25:22/11956/ 3435205 mt=0 fname=gpgol_string_8' ct=application/octet-stream' ct_parms=`(null)'
18:25:22/11956/mapihelp.cpp:mapi_mark_moss_attach: Marking 3435173 as MOSS attachment
18:25:22/11956/ERROR/mapihelp.cpp:mapi_mark_moss_attach: can't set GpgOL Attach Type property: hr=0x80070005
18:25:22/11956/mapihelp.cpp:mapi_mark_moss_attach: Marking 3435205 as MOSS attachment
18:25:22/11956/ERROR/mapihelp.cpp:mapi_mark_moss_attach: can't set GpgOL Attach Type property: hr=0x80070005

We've run into the testTofuConflict failure on NixOS. gpgme v1.12, gnupg v2.2.12.

Reporter in wald said that he is using GMX with POP3. I don't see how that could change compose actions but maybe Outlook internally uses a different MAPI Provider which could cause different behavior. I have not tested POP 3 in a long time so this will be the next step here.

I had a report of this by mail where the problem was that:

Thanks a lot for your logs. I see what's going on here.
For some reason, Yubikey keeps running after failure by suspend/resume (perhaps, because it serves for multiple functionalities of USB HID for OTP, as well as CCID for OpenPGPcard).
This failure mode is not expected by the current implementation of scdaemon, under in-stock CCID driver.

Right. We won't change that though. Sorry.

Attached the wireshark log

The workaround in T3825 is for PC/SC driver. So, it is not the case for internal stock CCID driver.
'scd reset /bye' does not let the scdaemon do reset process of the card itself. It resets the transaction of scdaemon.

Please never ever define NDEBUG. This is a severe misfeature of the assert macro.

That's exactly the point: I do want one common encryption key between the two cards: So I can distinguish between the two, but en-/decrypt with both.
One is on the GnuPG SmartCard, the other on a YubiKey - output --card-status (some things xxx'ed out) :

Here's the patch:

Please show us your output of gpg --card-status for each card, and tell us the reason why you think "the pgp db seems screwed up".

For my test, six distinct keys (three subkeys for each smartcard) works fine.
IIUC, you try to use same decryption key by two smartcards. Currently, it is not supported.

Is it an issue when you share an decryption key E among two smartcards?
I think that when there are six distinct keys (three subkeys for one smartcard each), it works fine.
I'll try to make reproducible test case.