IIUC, simpler solution would be modifying m4/socklen.m4 adding Solaris variant specific code.
Tweaking _XOPEN_SOURCE requires the change of Autoconf (if done correctly), which would be larger surgery.

Not sure about gpg4win 4.2.0 but we had a bug in 4.3.0 which has been resolved with T6985

Tested with a Gpg4win-Beta and VSD-3.2.94.474-Beta:

Closing since the cause for this was identified.

My comment referred exclusively to Tobias's "In the future [...]" comment.

This is what Tobias means:

Isn't the name of the tab showing the imported certificates "Imported Certficates" or something like that? The filter "All" shows all imported certificates. And when you select the filter OpenPGP you see the subset of imported OpenPGP certificates. Therefore, I don't think it makes sense to add a custom filter.

tested with Gpg4win 4.4

@ilf: Yes these message are emitted using log_info in 2.4.7 and 2.5.2. Thus they don't case a failure exit. I will silence them with --quiet in 2.5.3.

https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2024-December/035686.html <- is a question to see if the situation has changed meanwhile. (I've send it to the list because the topic affects several things in the application and thus ggoes beyond an issue like this one.)

This doesn't happen anymore now that we offer all valid user IDs and not just the primary user IDs.

Backported for VSD 3.3 / Gpg4win 4.4.1.

I'll backport this for VSD 3.3 / Gpg4win 4.4.1. Regression risk is minimal.

Gpg4win 4.4.0 has just been released. Creation of encrypted archives has been completely reworked with Gpg4win 4.3.0 already. I could create an encrypted archive containing the two files with GpgEX without problems.

Gpg4win 4.4.0 has just been released. I cannot reproduce unexpected results when doing a lookup on server. Unfortunately, many keyservers do not publish the user IDs (i.e. name and/or email address) anymore. Kleopatra does not list results without user IDs because GnuPG won't import them anyway.

This has been fixed in the meantime. If you should still experience this problem with Gpg4win 4.4.0 then reopen this ticket.

Gpg4win 4.4.0 has just been released. I assume that this has been fixed in the meantime. In particular, "General error" should happen a lot less. If the problem still occurs with Gpg4win 4.4.0 then reopen the ticket.

This ticket is obsolete

I assume the problem has been resolved because we never got feedback that the problem persists.

This problem has been fixed quite some time ago. See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415168.

This doesn't look like a problem in Kleopatra.

We won't revert to the old UI which had its own share of problems. In the meantime Kleopatra supports certificate groups which should help if you often need to encrypt for the same keys.

I get this message even with --quiet:

Fixed in 2.5.0 and 2.4.6.

Fixed in 2.5.0 and 2.4.6.

Fixed in 2.4.6.

Fixed in 2.4.6.

Fixed in 2.4.6.

I believe this was fixed by T7386. Or it is now no hard lock up by T7402.
So, let me close this ticket.
If any new symptom, please add information into T7396.

Gpg4win-Beta-94: works

Well, T6893 was removed from this release, at least for the windows builds, therefore this ticket can not be tested on windows for vsd33

tested with Gpg4win-Beta-75++

For this ticket, I reviewed the code around my SOS changes.
Because I'd like to focus the point of retaining binary representation when doing import->export,
I created another thicket: T7426

For master fixed with rGbb6b38c24010258c7cb2da840d0a088fe43393b3 (Wrong bug id used).
Also fixed for gnupg24.

Gpg4win-Beta-75++

tested with Gpg4win-Beta-75++

Fixed (for Gpg4win 4.4 / VSD 3.3) by patching Qt's Windows Vista style.

Perfect, thank you!

You are right. Printing the algo was missing in gnupg22.

thanks for the clarification. i was not objecting to the workflow, i was trying to understand so that i can interact with the bug tracker appropriately. I was unaware of the difference between "milestones" and other project tags. I'll try to get that right in the future.

Please do not add milestone tags.

gnupg24 (gnupg-2.4.5) is a milestone and means "fixed in gnupg24 (gnupg-2.4.5)". I suggest not to question the workflow of the people running this bug tracker.

@ebo i'm not sure i understand why you removed the gnupg24 (gnupg-2.4.5) project label. the report indicates that GnuPG 2.4.6 at least (other versions untested, but i didn't see a gnupg24 (gnupg-2.4.6) label in this system) produces MPI artifacts for EdDSA/Ed25519 signatures that are non-compliant with all the known specifications. the 2.2 series appears to retain compatible MPI formats.

with no real world impact.

This is not a bug in 2.2, this is a bug in 2.4.

2.2. reaches EOL in 6 weeks and thus we won't look at a potential problem with no real world impact.

after a bit more testing, it looks to me like 2.2.45 will revise the signature packet to use 0x00ed as the MPI header for r, if it receives input from 2.4.6. And 2.4.6 will revise the signature packet to use 0x0100 as the MPI header for r. So the same OpenPGP self-sig will change shape each time it is passed back and forth between the different versions.