It's a bug I introduced when fixing T7309.
Fixed in rGaa36f6ae8bae: gpg: Fix key generation with existing key from card.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Dec 16 2024
Dec 13 2024
@uwi: We removed the ciphersuite from the server and tested with 4.2.0 that you get an update notification now. Because of some caching you may need to
This is due to an update of the server providing the version info. The server (Apache) uses a smaller hash than the ECC key. This is allowed behaviour and was fixed in our TLS library in 2022; see T6059. However, the new library was released only early this year an. We will check whether we can tell our Apache to use a more correct hash algorithm.
Dec 12 2024
In T7454#195889, @ikloecker wrote:Which dialogs? pinentry? If yes, then your assumption is correct. pinentry also gets the texts from GnuPG.
Which dialogs? pinentry? If yes, then your assumption is correct. pinentry also gets the texts from GnuPG.
There is another customer request for this too.
IIUC, simpler solution would be modifying m4/socklen.m4 adding Solaris variant specific code.
Tweaking _XOPEN_SOURCE requires the change of Autoconf (if done correctly), which would be larger surgery.
Dec 11 2024
Not sure about gpg4win 4.2.0 but we had a bug in 4.3.0 which has been resolved with T6985
Tested with a Gpg4win-Beta and VSD-3.2.94.474-Beta:
Closing since the cause for this was identified.
Dec 10 2024
Dec 6 2024
My comment referred exclusively to Tobias's "In the future [...]" comment.
This is what Tobias means:
Isn't the name of the tab showing the imported certificates "Imported Certficates" or something like that? The filter "All" shows all imported certificates. And when you select the filter OpenPGP you see the subset of imported OpenPGP certificates. Therefore, I don't think it makes sense to add a custom filter.
tested with Gpg4win 4.4
Dec 5 2024
@ilf: Yes these message are emitted using log_info in 2.4.7 and 2.5.2. Thus they don't case a failure exit. I will silence them with --quiet in 2.5.3.
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2024-December/035686.html <- is a question to see if the situation has changed meanwhile. (I've send it to the list because the topic affects several things in the application and thus ggoes beyond an issue like this one.)
Dec 4 2024
This doesn't happen anymore now that we offer all valid user IDs and not just the primary user IDs.
Dec 3 2024
Backported for VSD 3.3 / Gpg4win 4.4.1.
I'll backport this for VSD 3.3 / Gpg4win 4.4.1. Regression risk is minimal.
Dec 2 2024
Gpg4win 4.4.0 has just been released. Creation of encrypted archives has been completely reworked with Gpg4win 4.3.0 already. I could create an encrypted archive containing the two files with GpgEX without problems.
Gpg4win 4.4.0 has just been released. I cannot reproduce unexpected results when doing a lookup on server. Unfortunately, many keyservers do not publish the user IDs (i.e. name and/or email address) anymore. Kleopatra does not list results without user IDs because GnuPG won't import them anyway.
This has been fixed in the meantime. If you should still experience this problem with Gpg4win 4.4.0 then reopen this ticket.
Gpg4win 4.4.0 has just been released. I assume that this has been fixed in the meantime. In particular, "General error" should happen a lot less. If the problem still occurs with Gpg4win 4.4.0 then reopen the ticket.
This ticket is obsolete
I assume the problem has been resolved because we never got feedback that the problem persists.
This problem has been fixed quite some time ago. See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415168.
This doesn't look like a problem in Kleopatra.
We won't revert to the old UI which had its own share of problems. In the meantime Kleopatra supports certificate groups which should help if you often need to encrypt for the same keys.
Nov 30 2024
I get this message even with --quiet:
Nov 29 2024
Fixed in 2.5.0 and 2.4.6.
Fixed in 2.5.0 and 2.4.6.
Fixed in 2.4.6.
Fixed in 2.4.6.
Fixed in 2.4.6.
Nov 27 2024
Nov 26 2024
Gpg4win-Beta-94: works
Nov 25 2024
Well, T6893 was removed from this release, at least for the windows builds, therefore this ticket can not be tested on windows for vsd33
tested with Gpg4win-Beta-75++
For this ticket, I reviewed the code around my SOS changes.
Because I'd like to focus the point of retaining binary representation when doing import->export,
I created another thicket: T7426
Nov 22 2024
For master fixed with rGbb6b38c24010258c7cb2da840d0a088fe43393b3 (Wrong bug id used).
Also fixed for gnupg24.
Gpg4win-Beta-75++
Nov 21 2024
tested with Gpg4win-Beta-75++
Fixed (for Gpg4win 4.4 / VSD 3.3) by patching Qt's Windows Vista style.
Perfect, thank you!
[GNUPG:] BEGIN_DECRYPTION [GNUPG:] DECRYPTION_INFO 0 9 0 [GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 62 1732178872 [GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT_LENGTH 72 You will be advanced socially, without any special effort on your part. [GNUPG:] DECRYPTION_OKAY
You are right. Printing the algo was missing in gnupg22.
Nov 20 2024
thanks for the clarification. i was not objecting to the workflow, i was trying to understand so that i can interact with the bug tracker appropriately. I was unaware of the difference between "milestones" and other project tags. I'll try to get that right in the future.