Unfortunately, the configuration dialog does not work at all for me. It says "The shared library was not found.", but it fails to say which library was not found.

The compliance with VS is stated in the tooltip. Is that sufficient or shall we make it more prominent with a background color?

There is a tooltip saying "May be used for VS-compliant communication." for compliant keys, is that enough highlighting? Or shall we give those keys a light green background color or something?

So I started with this one because it was the easiest. To reduce message fatigue, I only display compliance information if gnupg is in co-de compliance mode.

Is this about the gui not offering e.g. the wrong algorithm or key sizes in the first place? If so, then we have to either hard-code it in kleopatra, or communicate it from gnupg. I guess at this point, we'll have to hard-code it :/

Please reopen if this is still an issue with the latest version of gpg4win.

Please reopen if it can be reproduced with a recent version of gpg4win.

https://files.gpg4win.org/Beta/current/

Unlikely

GpgOL has even been revamped 2 times since then.

Is this still an issue with the latest version?

Is this still an issue?

I don't think we can do anything about slow startup times due to anti-virus software, sorry.

Is this still an issue?

According to Wikipedia, Live Meeting was discontinued. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Office_Live_Meeting

Is this still an issue?

Is this still an issue?

2.3.3 of gpg4win

1.4.0 of gpgol

Which version of gpgol (or Gpg4win) are you using?

We can close this. The current Master of GpgOL states that Outlook 2003 and 2007 Support is no longer maintained and we will remove support for this altogether in new versions. With current Master this issue also no longer occurs.

GpgEX is now also compiled with ASLR + DEP. I still have to check some other binaries of Gpg4win before I close this task but I no longer see it as blocking a 3.0 release where I wanted to have this included.

beta232 has some basic compliance support mainly missing is Compliance indication for crypto operations (encrypt / decrypt / sign /verify)

Emanuel please add release gpg4win 3.0 as a parent task if you think we should fix this before 3.0. I'm unsure.

I'm very sure this is no longer an issue.

Will be released with 3.0

We no longer use Kleopatra for status in our supported versions (OL >2010). So resolved.

This is fixed in gpgol master.

Accidentally marked this as resolved when I only wanted to update the status.

As a first version you can now apply profiles in Kleopatra. It also respects the default_pubkey_algo_name and shows in tooltips / certificate details if a certificate is compliant.

• Original Message ------

From: "Andre Heinecke via BTS" <gnupg@bugs.g10code.com>
To: aheinecke@intevation.de; dr_it@mailbox.org
Sent: 16-1-2017 15:35:25
Subject: [issue2892] GpgOL: Encrypt is selected on Reply/Forward

Well if my wife is representable for a lot of "ordinary" users (and i
think she is), it will be hard to explain it to them and after that let
them remembering it or the future :(
Also this will not be the solution (i think) for when i want to move a
lot of mails (use case: mailbox space full, so want to archive older
mail to local folder by moving them from imap folder)?

Oops wrong, 251 did not yet have it, 253 will have it. Forgot to push the change.

I've added the option. It's in the latest beta (251) from files.gpg4win.org
A beta installer containing this version will be published likely this or next week.

We are aiming for a stable release middle of march.

While this f.e. for my wife will not work, not user friendly enough :(

I'm really really sad to hear that. I was hoping this was acceptable to
"non-technical" users just one of the quirks users eventually get used too :-(

I tried to think about this more but I don't see another solution then:
a) Prevent Outlook from saving any changes after a message was decrypted

• This is the current behavior and leads to the problem.

b) When Outlook want's to save a mail remove the plaintext, restore the
encrypted contents and save the changes to the encrypted mail.

• This has a serious downside that it does trigger a full resync of the mail

because outlook thinks the attachments have changed. When closing Outlook this
also somehow brought Outlook in a state that it kept indefitely syncing a single
mail :-/. It also broke the signatures on singed only mails because the MIME
boundarys could not be restored. In general I found it much more unstable and
buggy then a clear "Sorry you can't do that". :-/

Ok, I found the problem, as we handle the selection changed event in the
messagelist we were trying to decrypt messages even if they were not loaded /
visible in the preview window. That caused a weird state and several errors.

I've fixed it now so that we only decrypt items when a selection changes in an
Explorer that has a visible preview pane. I'll let you know once a beta with
that fix is released.

Thanks again,
Andre

Well if this works, i could live with it temporary, but not indefinitely. While
this f.e. for my wife will not work, not user friendly enough :(
So hopefully you can work this out somewhere in the future, but from you reply i
understand this is not something i should expect soon (or ever)...
I'm also testing EM Client which has promised to come with PGP support, so will
wait a little longer and then decide which (best available) way i'm going to use
(now temporary disabled online encryption).

Thank you for making this an optional setting! Any idea in what release this
will be planned?

Done now

Thanks for testing the beta and your report. I can reproduce some weird crashes
when the preview pane is disabled, too. It's not 100% for me but some times
after sending a crypto mail sometimes later it crashes, sometimes when switching
folders it crashes, very weird. Sometimes the decrypted contents of a mail are
not shown after opening it.

And with preview everything is fine.

Looking into it.

Yes, We fixed that. Sorry I didn't see your bugreport then.

Btw. You can also send such E-Mails encrypted with GpgOL nowadays :-)

http://files.intevation.de/users/aheinecke/gpgol-kitten.png